From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-404902-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 83027 invoked by alias); 10 Aug 2015 08:24:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 82995 invoked by uid 89); 10 Aug 2015 08:24:02 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: cam-smtp0.cambridge.arm.com
Received: from fw-tnat.cambridge.arm.com (HELO cam-smtp0.cambridge.arm.com) (217.140.96.140) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 08:24:01 +0000
Received: from arm.com (e106375-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.2.207.23])	by cam-smtp0.cambridge.arm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t7A8Ntsj016286;	Mon, 10 Aug 2015 09:23:55 +0100
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 08:24:00 -0000
From: James Greenhalgh <james.greenhalgh@arm.com>
To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
Cc: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>,        Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>,        Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>, Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>,        GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,        Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org>,        David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>,        Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com>
Subject: Re: [PR64164] drop copyrename, integrate into expand
Message-ID: <20150810082355.GA31149@arm.com>
References: <orio9cw10j.fsf@livre.home> <CAFiYyc3k9xh_6RGbTdHYOJ-aEmUWVeFRoWy=YzCHFDNSdtTXCA@mail.gmail.com> <orwpxqvqnp.fsf@livre.home> <20150723203112.GB27818@gate.crashing.org> <CAMe9rOpR+2gPxo0tKaRPtcML_Q4=r-_=9iqk+_JZFPkM=eN=BQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAMe9rOpbLEyDexVJqJAFJ3W6o4AktNog-jwk2CY4GZkrmT+nfA@mail.gmail.com> <or4mkmhgc9.fsf@livre.home> <CAMe9rOp=S5fu1N=i7waswCYqJeLBCrySqYdFYkVa7LV04vpQSg@mail.gmail.com> <CAMe9rOrq+ZBAg1nZ1twEcPqwBj4j9+XA+SXQJVWWzjfdvidjtw@mail.gmail.com> <or1tfkdjhj.fsf@livre.home>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <or1tfkdjhj.fsf@livre.home>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2015-08/txt/msg00439.txt.bz2

On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 12:45:28AM +0100, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Jul 30, 2015, "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > aoliva/pr64164  is fine on x32.
> 
> Thanks.  I have made a large number of changes since you tested it,
> fixing all the reported issues and then some.  Now, x86_64-linux-gnu
> (-m64 and -m32), i686-pc-linux-gnu, powerpc64-linux-gnu and
> powerpc64el-linux-gnu pass regstrap (r226317), and the many tens of
> targets I cross-tested still get the same 'make all' errors that the
> pristine tree did.

For what it is worth, I bootstrapped and tested the consolidated patch
on arm-none-linux-gnueabihf and aarch64-none-linux-gnu with trunk at
r226516 over the weekend, and didn't see any new issues.

Thanks,
James