From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 111476 invoked by alias); 12 Aug 2015 17:40:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 111440 invoked by uid 89); 12 Aug 2015 17:40:42 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 17:40:40 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA0C68EB56; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 17:40:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (ovpn-204-21.brq.redhat.com [10.40.204.21]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t7CHeYH8019068 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 12 Aug 2015 13:40:37 -0400 Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 17:40:00 -0000 From: Marek Polacek To: Jeff Law Cc: Toon Moene , GCC Patches , Jason Merrill , Joseph Myers Subject: Re: [C/C++ PATCH] Fix -Wshift-overflow with sign bit Message-ID: <20150812174034.GL3335@redhat.com> References: <20150812153927.GK3335@redhat.com> <55CB8230.7080509@moene.org> <55CB8361.7030507@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55CB8361.7030507@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SW-Source: 2015-08/txt/msg00642.txt.bz2 On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 11:33:21AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > On 08/12/2015 11:28 AM, Toon Moene wrote: > >https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2015-08/msg01036.html > > > >[ Yes, that's at run time, not compile time ... ] > Hoping some of those are fixed by the sext_hwi changes from Mikael. I hope too ;). But they have nothing to do with the -Wshift-overflow IMHO. Marek