public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>,
	Sriraman Tallam <tmsriram@google.com>,
	Alexander Monakov <amonakov@ispras.ru>
Subject: RFC: [PATCH] PR target/67215: -fno-plt needs improvements for x86
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2015 18:44:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150816183618.GA10898@gmail.com> (raw)

prepare_call_address in calls.c is the wrong place to handle -fno-plt.
We shoudn't force function address into register and hope that load
function address via GOT and indirect call via register will be folded
into indirect call via GOT, which doesn't always happen.  Allso non-PIC
case can only be handled in backend.  Instead, backend should expand
external function call into indirect call via GOT for -fno-plt.

This patch reverts -fno-plt in prepare_call_address and handles it in
ix86_expand_call.  Other backends may need similar changes to support
-fno-plt.  Alternately, we can introduce a target hook to indicate
whether an external function should be called via register for -fno-plt
so that i386 backend can disable it in prepare_call_address.

Any comments?

H.J.
--
gcc/

	PR target/67215
	* calls.c (prepare_call_address): Don't handle -fno-plt here.
	* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_expand_call): Generate indirect call
	via GOT for -fno-plt.  Support indirect call via GOT for x32.

gcc/testsuite/

	PR target/67215
	* gcc.target/i386/pr67215-1.c: New test.
	* gcc.target/i386/pr67215-2.c: Likewise.
---
 gcc/calls.c                               | 12 ------
 gcc/config/i386/i386.c                    | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr67215-1.c | 20 ++++++++++
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr67215-2.c | 20 ++++++++++
 4 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr67215-1.c
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr67215-2.c

diff --git a/gcc/calls.c b/gcc/calls.c
index 5636725..7cce9be 100644
--- a/gcc/calls.c
+++ b/gcc/calls.c
@@ -203,18 +203,6 @@ prepare_call_address (tree fndecl_or_type, rtx funexp, rtx static_chain_value,
 	       && targetm.small_register_classes_for_mode_p (FUNCTION_MODE))
 	      ? force_not_mem (memory_address (FUNCTION_MODE, funexp))
 	      : memory_address (FUNCTION_MODE, funexp));
-  else if (flag_pic
-	   && fndecl_or_type
-	   && TREE_CODE (fndecl_or_type) == FUNCTION_DECL
-	   && (!flag_plt
-	       || lookup_attribute ("noplt", DECL_ATTRIBUTES (fndecl_or_type)))
-	   && !targetm.binds_local_p (fndecl_or_type))
-    {
-      /* This is done only for PIC code.  There is no easy interface to force the
-	 function address into GOT for non-PIC case.  non-PIC case needs to be
-	 handled specially by the backend.  */
-      funexp = force_reg (Pmode, funexp);
-    }
   else if (! sibcallp)
     {
       if (!NO_FUNCTION_CSE && optimize && ! flag_no_function_cse)
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
index 4a0986c..bf8a21d 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
@@ -25650,21 +25650,50 @@ ix86_expand_call (rtx retval, rtx fnaddr, rtx callarg1,
       /* Static functions and indirect calls don't need the pic register.  Also,
 	 check if PLT was explicitly avoided via no-plt or "noplt" attribute, making
 	 it an indirect call.  */
+      rtx addr = XEXP (fnaddr, 0);
       if (flag_pic
-	  && (!TARGET_64BIT
-	      || (ix86_cmodel == CM_LARGE_PIC
-		  && DEFAULT_ABI != MS_ABI))
-	  && GET_CODE (XEXP (fnaddr, 0)) == SYMBOL_REF
-	  && !SYMBOL_REF_LOCAL_P (XEXP (fnaddr, 0))
-	  && flag_plt
-	  && (SYMBOL_REF_DECL ((XEXP (fnaddr, 0))) == NULL_TREE
-	      || !lookup_attribute ("noplt",
-		     DECL_ATTRIBUTES (SYMBOL_REF_DECL (XEXP (fnaddr, 0))))))
+	  && GET_CODE (addr) == SYMBOL_REF
+	  && !SYMBOL_REF_LOCAL_P (addr))
 	{
-	  use_reg (&use, gen_rtx_REG (Pmode, REAL_PIC_OFFSET_TABLE_REGNUM));
-	  if (ix86_use_pseudo_pic_reg ())
-	    emit_move_insn (gen_rtx_REG (Pmode, REAL_PIC_OFFSET_TABLE_REGNUM),
-			    pic_offset_table_rtx);
+	  if (flag_plt
+	      && (SYMBOL_REF_DECL (addr) == NULL_TREE
+		  || !lookup_attribute ("noplt",
+					DECL_ATTRIBUTES (SYMBOL_REF_DECL (addr)))))
+	    {
+	      if (!TARGET_64BIT
+		  || (ix86_cmodel == CM_LARGE_PIC
+		      && DEFAULT_ABI != MS_ABI))
+		{
+		  use_reg (&use, gen_rtx_REG (Pmode,
+					      REAL_PIC_OFFSET_TABLE_REGNUM));
+		  if (ix86_use_pseudo_pic_reg ())
+		    emit_move_insn (gen_rtx_REG (Pmode,
+						 REAL_PIC_OFFSET_TABLE_REGNUM),
+				    pic_offset_table_rtx);
+		}
+	    }
+	  else if (!TARGET_PECOFF && !TARGET_MACHO)
+	    {
+	      if (TARGET_64BIT)
+		{
+		  fnaddr = gen_rtx_UNSPEC (Pmode,
+					   gen_rtvec (1, addr),
+					   UNSPEC_GOTPCREL);
+		  fnaddr = gen_rtx_CONST (Pmode, fnaddr);
+		}
+	      else
+		{
+		  fnaddr = gen_rtx_UNSPEC (Pmode, gen_rtvec (1, addr),
+					   UNSPEC_GOT);
+		  fnaddr = gen_rtx_CONST (Pmode, fnaddr);
+		  fnaddr = gen_rtx_PLUS (Pmode, pic_offset_table_rtx,
+					 fnaddr);
+		}
+	      fnaddr = gen_const_mem (Pmode, fnaddr);
+	      if (GET_MODE (fnaddr) != word_mode)
+		fnaddr = gen_rtx_ZERO_EXTEND (word_mode, fnaddr);
+	      fnaddr = gen_rtx_MEM (QImode, fnaddr);
+	    }
 	}
     }
 
@@ -25686,9 +25715,13 @@ ix86_expand_call (rtx retval, rtx fnaddr, rtx callarg1,
       && GET_CODE (XEXP (fnaddr, 0)) == SYMBOL_REF
       && !local_symbolic_operand (XEXP (fnaddr, 0), VOIDmode))
     fnaddr = gen_rtx_MEM (QImode, construct_plt_address (XEXP (fnaddr, 0)));
-  else if (sibcall
-	   ? !sibcall_insn_operand (XEXP (fnaddr, 0), word_mode)
-	   : !call_insn_operand (XEXP (fnaddr, 0), word_mode))
+  else if (!(TARGET_X32
+	     && MEM_P (fnaddr)
+	     && GET_CODE (XEXP (fnaddr, 0)) == ZERO_EXTEND
+	     && GOT_memory_operand (XEXP (XEXP (fnaddr, 0), 0), Pmode))
+	   && (sibcall
+	       ? !sibcall_insn_operand (XEXP (fnaddr, 0), word_mode)
+	       : !call_insn_operand (XEXP (fnaddr, 0), word_mode)))
     {
       fnaddr = convert_to_mode (word_mode, XEXP (fnaddr, 0), 1);
       fnaddr = gen_rtx_MEM (QImode, copy_to_mode_reg (word_mode, fnaddr));
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr67215-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr67215-1.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..fd37f8e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr67215-1.c
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+/* { dg-do compile { target *-*-linux* } } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fpic -fno-plt" } */
+
+extern char* bar (int);
+extern char* arr[32];
+
+void
+foo (void)
+{
+  int i;
+
+  for (i = 0; i < 32; i++)
+    arr[i] = bar (128);
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "call\[ \t\]*.bar@GOTPCREL" { target { ! ia32 } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "call\[ \t\]*.bar@GOT\\(" { target ia32 } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "mov(l|q)\[ \t\]*.bar@GOTPCREL" { target { ! ia32 } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "movl\[ \t\]*.bar@GOT\\(" { target ia32 } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "call\[ \t\]*.bar@PLT" } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr67215-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr67215-2.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ebf2919
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr67215-2.c
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+/* { dg-do compile { target *-*-linux* } } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fpic" } */
+
+extern char* bar (int) __attribute__ ((noplt));
+extern char* arr[32];
+
+void
+foo (void)
+{
+  int i;
+
+  for (i = 0; i < 32; i++)
+    arr[i] = bar (128);
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "call\[ \t\]*.bar@GOTPCREL" { target { ! ia32 } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "call\[ \t\]*.bar@GOT\\(" { target ia32 } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "mov(l|q)\[ \t\]*.bar@GOTPCREL" { target { ! ia32 } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "movl\[ \t\]*.bar@GOT\\(" { target ia32 } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "call\[ \t\]*.bar@PLT" } } */
-- 
2.4.3

             reply	other threads:[~2015-08-16 18:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-16 18:44 H.J. Lu [this message]
2015-08-16 19:39 ` Alexander Monakov
2015-08-16 19:50   ` H.J. Lu
2015-08-17  1:14     ` H.J. Lu
2015-08-17 17:17       ` Alexander Monakov
2015-08-17 17:32         ` H.J. Lu
2015-08-19 12:50           ` H.J. Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150816183618.GA10898@gmail.com \
    --to=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=amonakov@ispras.ru \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=tmsriram@google.com \
    --cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).