[patch] Restore installation of libstdc++.so.6.0.??-gdb.py

[patch] Restore installation of libstdc++.so.6.0.??-gdb.py

[Jonathan Wakely]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 360 bytes --]

Matthias noticed that my backport of the Filesystem library removed
the libstdc++.so.6.0.21-gdb.py file, which was now getting installed
as libstdc++fs.a-gdb.py instead.

Fixed by changing the glob we use to find the candidate library files
that we use for the name of the installed gdb.py file.

Tested powerpc64le-linux, committed to trunk and gcc-5-branch.

[-- Attachment #2: patch.txt --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 784 bytes --]

commit dc3403f07733a847f37e15c856759a94aa7e97d7
Author: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu Aug 20 11:11:51 2015 +0100

    	* python/Makefile.am: Ensure gdb.py is installed for libstdc++ not
    	libstdc++fs.
    	* python/Makefile.in: Regenerate.

diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/python/Makefile.am b/libstdc++-v3/python/Makefile.am
index 5d78224..ccb9427 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/python/Makefile.am
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/python/Makefile.am
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ install-data-local: gdb.py
 ## fragile, but there does not seem to be a better option, because
 ## libtool hides the real names from us.
 	@here=`pwd`; cd $(DESTDIR)$(toolexeclibdir); \
-	  for file in libstdc++*; do \
+	  for file in libstdc++.*; do \
 	    case $$file in \
 	      *-gdb.py) ;; \
 	      *.la) ;; \