From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4348 invoked by alias); 20 Aug 2015 17:00:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 4258 invoked by uid 89); 20 Aug 2015 17:00:10 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 17:00:09 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D3308E77B; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 17:00:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (ovpn-204-61.brq.redhat.com [10.40.204.61]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t7KH02Mo030340 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 20 Aug 2015 13:00:05 -0400 Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 17:02:00 -0000 From: Marek Polacek To: Jeff Law Cc: Andreas Schwab , Richard Biener , GCC Patches Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix middle-end/67133, part 1 Message-ID: <20150820170001.GG2729@redhat.com> References: <20150814195836.GB2093@redhat.com> <55CE5054.5080400@redhat.com> <20150814204649.GC2093@redhat.com> <55D21A8D.50004@redhat.com> <20150818194918.GB2729@redhat.com> <20150820103758.GE2729@redhat.com> <55D60338.2080306@redhat.com> <20150820165145.GF2729@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150820165145.GF2729@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SW-Source: 2015-08/txt/msg01233.txt.bz2 On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 06:51:45PM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote: > and single_succ_p (bb) is not satisfied, so it must have more outgoing edges. > Not sure how can that happen... Actually the problem seems to be that the BB ends with return but it has *no* outgoing edges. Marek