From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 104744 invoked by alias); 18 Sep 2015 13:36:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 104729 invoked by uid 89); 18 Sep 2015 13:36:01 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: paperclip.tbsaunde.org Received: from tbsaunde.org (HELO paperclip.tbsaunde.org) (66.228.47.254) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Sep 2015 13:35:55 +0000 Received: from tsaunders-iceball.corp.tor1.mozilla.com (unknown [23.233.68.71]) by paperclip.tbsaunde.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8B2C5C069; Fri, 18 Sep 2015 13:35:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 13:38:00 -0000 From: Trevor Saunders To: David Malcolm Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: (patch,rfc) s/gimple/gimple */ Message-ID: <20150918133200.GA22271@tsaunders-iceball.corp.tor1.mozilla.com> References: <20150916131510.GA21102@tsaunders-iceball.corp.tor1.mozilla.com> <1442430674.32352.109.camel@surprise> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1442430674.32352.109.camel@surprise> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SW-Source: 2015-09/txt/msg01408.txt.bz2 On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 03:11:14PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote: > On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 09:16 -0400, Trevor Saunders wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I gave changing from gimple to gimple * a shot last week. It turned out > > to be not too hard. As you might expect the patch is huge so its > > attached compressed. > > > > patch was bootstrapped + regtested on x86_64-linux-gnu, and run through > > config-list.mk. However I needed to update it some for changes made > > while testing. Do people want to make this change now? If so I'll try > > and commit the patch over the weekend when less is changing. > > > FWIW there are some big changes in gcc/tree-vect-slp.c:vectorizable_load > that looks like unrelated whitespace changes, e.g. the following (and > there are some followup hunks). Did something change underneath, or was > there a stray whitespace cleanup here? (I skimmed through the patch, > and this was the only file I spotted where something looked wrong) yeah, it was a stray whitespace cleanup, but I reverted it. Given the few but only positive comments I've seen I'm planning to commit this over the weekend. Trev