From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 119447 invoked by alias); 2 Oct 2015 10:29:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 119436 invoked by uid 89); 2 Oct 2015 10:29:06 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 10:29:06 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF256461E2; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 10:29:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (ovpn-204-77.brq.redhat.com [10.40.204.77]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t92AT10O009987 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 2 Oct 2015 06:29:03 -0400 Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 10:29:00 -0000 From: Marek Polacek To: James Greenhalgh Cc: Jakub Jelinek , Richard Biener , GCC Patches Subject: Re: [Patch match.pd] Add a simplify rule for x * copysign (1.0, y); Message-ID: <20151002102900.GX6184@redhat.com> References: <1443707835-6888-1-git-send-email-james.greenhalgh@arm.com> <20151001183643.GD28276@tucnak.redhat.com> <20151002090358.GE28276@tucnak.redhat.com> <20151002092711.GF28276@tucnak.redhat.com> <20151002095842.GG28276@tucnak.redhat.com> <20151002100653.GV6184@redhat.com> <20151002102432.GA22769@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151002102432.GA22769@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SW-Source: 2015-10/txt/msg00193.txt.bz2 On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 11:24:32AM +0100, James Greenhalgh wrote: > > > PR67815. > > > > James, are you interested in this one, or would you prefer if I take it? > > I'm happy either way. > > I haven't looked at reassoc before, so I don't know my way wround it, and > I'm out of office for a wedding in the next couple of weeks (+ other > ongoing stuff), so I'm not sure I'd be able to get a prototype out before > Stage 1 closes. Congrats (if it's your wedding) ;). > If you have the free cycles for it, I'd be happy for you to take it, if > not I'll try to get to it late this month. All right, I'll have a look at it next week; maybe I'll be able to come up with something (I cringe when I see floating-point stuff). Marek