From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32999 invoked by alias); 12 Oct 2015 22:53:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 32989 invoked by uid 89); 12 Oct 2015 22:53:35 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-pa0-f51.google.com Received: from mail-pa0-f51.google.com (HELO mail-pa0-f51.google.com) (209.85.220.51) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 22:53:34 +0000 Received: by pabrc13 with SMTP id rc13so603381pab.0 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 15:53:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.68.241.234 with SMTP id wl10mr37119953pbc.27.1444690412225; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 15:53:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bubble.grove.modra.org (CPE-58-160-163-67.gqzg1.fli.bigpond.net.au. [58.160.163.67]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k10sm20213961pbq.78.2015.10.12.15.53.30 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 12 Oct 2015 15:53:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by bubble.grove.modra.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4542BEA1530; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 09:23:26 +1030 (ACDT) Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 22:53:00 -0000 From: Alan Modra To: "Lynn A. Boger" Cc: Ian Lance Taylor , David Edelsohn , Andreas Schwab , Matthias Klose , gcc-patches Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR66870 PowerPC64 Enable gold linker with split stack Message-ID: <20151012225326.GI4434@bubble.grove.modra.org> References: <56101F0E.8000003@ubuntu.com> <56153C00.2000209@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <561556F9.8030802@ubuntu.com> <5616BC63.3060307@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <5616D609.2000400@ubuntu.com> <56181AD9.6080501@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <87vbae2z71.fsf@igel.home> <20151011130719.GF4434@bubble.grove.modra.org> <561BCE78.5040004@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <561BCE78.5040004@linux.vnet.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-10/txt/msg01181.txt.bz2 On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:15:04AM -0500, Lynn A. Boger wrote: > Thanks for doing this Alan. I agree this looks better to me. > > I assume by "etc" you mean you did biarch builds for your bootstraps on BE? By "etc" I meant "and regression tested". I built four configurations, powerpc-linux 32-bit only, powerpc64le-linux 64-bit only, biarch powerpc-linux with 32-bit default, and biarch powerpc64-linux with 64-bit default. -- Alan Modra Australia Development Lab, IBM