public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arkadiusz Drabczyk <arkadiusz@drabczyk.org>
To: Martin Sebor <msebor@gmail.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] c/67925 - update documentation on `inline'
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 12:24:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151015122510.GA4459@comp.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <561EF0BB.7090808@gmail.com>

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 06:18:03PM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 10/14/2015 03:42 PM, Arkadiusz Drabczyk wrote:
> >On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 08:36:43AM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
> >>On 10/13/2015 04:47 PM, Arkadiusz Drabczyk wrote:
> >>>* gcc/doc/extend.texi: documentation says that functions declared
> >>>`inline' would not be integrated if they are called before they are
> >>>defined or if they are recursive. Both of these statements is now
> >>>false as shown in examples on Bugzilla.
> >>
> >>It might also be worth updating the note in the subsequent
> >>paragraph and removing the mention of variable-length data types
> >>which no longer prevent inlining.
> >
> >Done.  I also removed the mention of nested functions as the following
> >code compiled with GCC 6.0 doesn't give any warning with -O2 -Winline
> >and main() is the only function defined in assembler code:
> 
> I think this is the Ada-specific warning I mentioned (see
> check_inlining_for_nested_subprog in gcc/ada/gcc-interface/trans.c)
> so the part about nested functions needs to stay.

Ok, I brought it back.

> >>	      = G_("function %q+F can never be inlined because "
> >>		   "it uses non-local goto");
> >
> >I tested of all of these and listed them in the documentation but
> >wasn't able to reproduce this one.  The following code does not give
> >any warning with -O2 -Winline:
> 
> The warning above is issued for non-local and computed goto. You can
> find examples of both in the test suite (find gcc/testsuite/ -name
> "*goto*.[cC]")

Aha, ok, I just thought that longjmp() counts as a non-local goto
here.  Indeed, this code invokes `function 'bar' can never be inlined
because it uses non-local goto' with -O2 -Winline (but only if
function that contains goto is nested, otherwise it fails to compile):

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>

int main (void)
{
	__label__ l1;

	void foo (void)
	{

		inline void bar (void)
		{
			puts ("goto l1");
			goto l1;
		}

		bar ();
	}

	foo ();
	abort ();
 l1:
	puts ("label l1");
	return 0;
}

I brought back a mention of nonlocal goto and added a mention of
__builtin_longjmp() as the usual longjmp() does not prevent inlining.

>8------------------------------------------------------8<
* gcc/doc/extend.texi: documentation says that functions declared
`inline' would not be integrated if they are called before they are
defined, if they are recursive, if they use variable-length data types
or if they are nested.  All of these statements are now false and have
been removed. Mention of setjmp(), __builtin_longjmp(),
__builtin_return() and __builtin_apply_args() has been added.
---
 gcc/doc/extend.texi | 22 ++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/doc/extend.texi b/gcc/doc/extend.texi
index 79440d3..bd559af 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/extend.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/extend.texi
@@ -7088,21 +7088,19 @@ function are integrated into the caller, and the function's address is
 never used, then the function's own assembler code is never referenced.
 In this case, GCC does not actually output assembler code for the
 function, unless you specify the option @option{-fkeep-inline-functions}.
-Some calls cannot be integrated for various reasons (in particular,
-calls that precede the function's definition cannot be integrated, and
-neither can recursive calls within the definition).  If there is a
-nonintegrated call, then the function is compiled to assembler code as
-usual.  The function must also be compiled as usual if the program
-refers to its address, because that can't be inlined.
+If there is a nonintegrated call, then the function is compiled to
+assembler code as usual.  The function must also be compiled as usual if
+the program refers to its address, because that can't be inlined.
 
 @opindex Winline
 Note that certain usages in a function definition can make it unsuitable
-for inline substitution.  Among these usages are: variadic functions, use of
-@code{alloca}, use of variable-length data types (@pxref{Variable Length}),
-use of computed goto (@pxref{Labels as Values}), use of nonlocal goto,
-and nested functions (@pxref{Nested Functions}).  Using @option{-Winline}
-warns when a function marked @code{inline} could not be substituted,
-and gives the reason for the failure.
+for inline substitution.  Among these usages are: variadic functions,
+use of @code{alloca}, use of computed goto (@pxref{Labels as Values}),
+use of nonlocal goto, use of nested functions, use of @code{setjmp}, use
+of @code{__builtin_longjmp} and use of @code{__builtin_return} or
+@code{__builtin_apply_args}.  Using @option{-Winline} warns when a
+function marked @code{inline} could not be substituted, and gives the
+reason for the failure.
 
 @cindex automatic @code{inline} for C++ member fns
 @cindex @code{inline} automatic for C++ member fns
-- 
2.3.5


-- 
Arkadiusz Drabczyk <arkadiusz@drabczyk.org>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-15 12:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-13 22:47 Arkadiusz Drabczyk
2015-10-14 14:36 ` Martin Sebor
2015-10-14 21:42   ` Arkadiusz Drabczyk
2015-10-15  0:18     ` Martin Sebor
2015-10-15 12:24       ` Arkadiusz Drabczyk [this message]
2015-10-20  5:55         ` Jeff Law

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151015122510.GA4459@comp.lan \
    --to=arkadiusz@drabczyk.org \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=msebor@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).