From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 38331 invoked by alias); 22 Nov 2015 21:44:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 38309 invoked by uid 89); 22 Nov 2015 21:44:25 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: troutmask.apl.washington.edu Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (HELO troutmask.apl.washington.edu) (128.95.76.21) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 21:44:24 +0000 Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id tAMLiK9X019871 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 22 Nov 2015 13:44:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id tAMLiK7A019870; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 13:44:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2015 22:01:00 -0000 From: Steve Kargl To: Jerry DeLisle Cc: gfortran , gcc patches Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix leading zero with g0 editing Message-ID: <20151122214420.GA19849@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <56523488.8080607@charter.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56523488.8080607@charter.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02627.txt.bz2 On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 01:32:56PM -0800, Jerry DeLisle wrote: > This minor patch brings the leading zero to emitting floats with g0 editing by > moving the block of code up a little before the g0 is handled. This has been > lurking in my trunk for several moths and I would like to get it out of the way. > Updated Test case also. > > Regression tested on x86-64-linux. > > OK for trunk? > OK. Thanks for the patch. -- Steve