From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6986 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 16:26:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6956 invoked by uid 89); 23 Nov 2015 16:26:02 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: smtp.eu.adacore.com Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO smtp.eu.adacore.com) (194.98.77.210) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 16:26:01 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C092435256DF; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 17:25:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp.eu.adacore.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i-k8mE5-7m0V; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 17:25:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from chelles.act-europe.fr (chelles.act-europe.fr [10.10.0.160]) by smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1F2D35256D6; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 17:25:58 +0100 (CET) Received: by chelles.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 525) id 9DDD51EA0445; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 17:25:58 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 16:31:00 -0000 From: Arnaud Charlet To: Eric Botcazou Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, "H.J. Lu" , Richard Biener , Jan Hubicka Subject: Re: Fix lto-symtab ICE during Ada LTO bootstrap Message-ID: <20151123162558.GA13201@adacore.com> References: <20151121182122.GB23225@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <4614625.leVTrnUMaK@polaris> <2994568.AbHtM70Sqm@polaris> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2994568.AbHtM70Sqm@polaris> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02755.txt.bz2 > > Will it also fix > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61954 > > Yes, probably, as well as the m68k issue, if that's really doable. Right, that's also why I think it's a more promising approach. Pretending that system.address is just an unsigned integer is bound to cause troubles, although handling system.address as a void* in gigi/gcc is also bound to cause some other troubles at this stage, but I suspect we'll have to bite the bullet at some point. Arno