On 25/11/15 19:55 +0000, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >On 25 November 2015 at 17:29, Alan Lawrence wrote: >> On 16/11/15 21:04, Doug Evans wrote: >>> >>> Hi. >>> >>> Apologies for the delay. >>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67440 >>> >>> Tested with current trunk. >>> >>> 2015-11-16 Doug Evans >>> >>> PR libstdc++/67440 >>> * python/libstdcxx/v6/printers.py (find_type): Handle "const" in >>> type name. >>> * testsuite/libstdc++-prettyprinters/debug.cc: Add test for >>> const set. >>> * testsuite/libstdc++-prettyprinters/simple.cc: Ditto. >>> * testsuite/libstdc++-prettyprinters/simple11.cc: Ditto. >> >> >> On gcc-5-branch, the debug.cc and simple.cc tests don't seem to compile, on >> either x86_64-none-linux-gnu or aarch64-none-linux-gnu. I get errors like: >> >> /work/alalaw01/src/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/libstdc++-prettyprinters/simple.cc: >> In function 'int main()': >> /work/alalaw01/src/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/libstdc++-prettyprinters/simple.cc:77:43: >> error: in C++98 'const_intset' must be initialized by constructor, not by >> '{...}' >> const std::set const_intset = {2, 3}; >> ^ > >Which should have failed to compile on trunk as well, but we're >missing a -std=gnu++98 in the simple.cc testcase, so on trunk it uses >the -std=gnu++14 default. I'll add -std=gnu++98 to the test. I've committed this to trunk, and will apply it to gcc-5-branch after I finish testing it on the branch.