From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>,
Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>,
Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>,
Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>,
GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [C PATCH] Fix -Wunused-function (PR debug/66869)
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 16:18:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160126161813.GB3017@tucnak.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFiYyc12VJd=HcmH6YsnwVWinfzBnMzq-WyujU85eg05LCUReg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 04:21:08PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > --- gcc/c/c-decl.c.jj 2016-01-21 00:41:47.000000000 +0100
> > +++ gcc/c/c-decl.c 2016-01-25 16:36:31.973504082 +0100
> > @@ -10741,11 +10741,19 @@ c_write_global_declarations_1 (tree glob
> > if (TREE_CODE (decl) == FUNCTION_DECL
> > && DECL_INITIAL (decl) == 0
> > && DECL_EXTERNAL (decl)
> > - && !TREE_PUBLIC (decl)
> > - && C_DECL_USED (decl))
> > + && !TREE_PUBLIC (decl))
> > {
> > - pedwarn (input_location, 0, "%q+F used but never defined", decl);
> > - TREE_NO_WARNING (decl) = 1;
> > + if (C_DECL_USED (decl))
> > + {
> > + pedwarn (input_location, 0, "%q+F used but never defined", decl);
> > + TREE_NO_WARNING (decl) = 1;
> > + }
> > + /* For -Wunused-function push the unused statics into cgraph,
> > + so that check_global_declaration emits the warning. */
> > + else if (warn_unused_function
> > + && ! DECL_ARTIFICIAL (decl)
> > + && ! TREE_NO_WARNING (decl))
> > + cgraph_node::get_create (decl);
>
> Err, so why not warn here directly?
You mean check if it has a cgraph node (i.e. get instead of get_create) and
if it doesn't, warn? What I'm worried in that case is that it might have a
cgraph node created later on for whatever reason and that we'll get double
warning (from here and from cgraphunit.c (check_global_declaration)).
I can try it though.
Jakub
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-26 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-25 20:38 Jakub Jelinek
2016-01-26 15:21 ` Richard Biener
2016-01-26 16:18 ` Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2016-01-27 10:17 ` Richard Biener
2016-01-27 18:52 ` Jakub Jelinek
2016-01-27 19:29 ` Jeff Law
2016-01-28 20:15 ` [C++ " Jakub Jelinek
2016-01-29 10:25 ` Jason Merrill
2016-01-29 10:35 ` Jakub Jelinek
2016-01-29 10:47 ` Jason Merrill
2016-01-29 12:31 ` Jakub Jelinek
2016-02-03 16:05 ` Jason Merrill
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160126161813.GB3017@tucnak.redhat.com \
--to=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=hubicka@ucw.cz \
--cc=jason@redhat.com \
--cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
--cc=polacek@redhat.com \
--cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).