Hi Paul,

thanks for the review. Commited as r232876.

Regards,
	Andre

On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 18:36:28 +0100
Paul Richard Thomas <paul.richard.thomas@gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear Andre,
> 
> The patch looks fine to me. OK for 5-branch.
> 
> Thanks for the patch.
> 
> Paul
> 
> On 26 January 2016 at 13:28, Andre Vehreschild <vehre@gmx.de> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > please find attached a patch to solve the issue of evaluating a source=
> > expression of an allocate() twice in gcc-5. The patch is a combination
> > and partial back port of several prs of the mainline (namely, but not
> > the complete list: pr44672, pr65548).
> >
> > The patch needed the counts of builtin_mallocs/frees in
> > allocatable_scalar_13 to be adapted. There are now fewer calls to the
> > memory management routines. Valgrind does not report any memory issues
> > in the modified code, but that does not mean there aren't any. I am
> > happy to hear about any issue, this patch causes (still having issues
> > getting the sanitizer to work).
> >
> > Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-linux-gnu/F23.
> >
> > Ok, for gcc-5-branch?
> >
> > Regards,
> >         Andre
> > --
> > Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de  
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de