From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 123689 invoked by alias); 28 Jan 2016 23:09:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 123673 invoked by uid 89); 28 Jan 2016 23:08:59 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 28 Jan 2016 23:08:58 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EE4133A88A for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2016 23:08:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (ovpn-204-33.brq.redhat.com [10.40.204.33]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u0SN8seW011176 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 28 Jan 2016 18:08:56 -0500 Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 23:09:00 -0000 From: Marek Polacek To: Jason Merrill Cc: GCC Patches Subject: Re: C++ PATCH for c++/69509 and c++/69516 (infinite recursion with invalid VLAs in constexpr functions) Message-ID: <20160128230853.GH25193@redhat.com> References: <20160128203305.GE25193@redhat.com> <56AA9B72.60701@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56AA9B72.60701@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-SW-Source: 2016-01/txt/msg02265.txt.bz2 On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 05:51:30PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote: > OK. I suppose we should also catch the out-of-bounds store in > cxx_eval_store_expression... Thanks, I'll look into that as a follow-up. Marek