From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16189 invoked by alias); 22 Feb 2016 11:55:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16177 invoked by uid 89); 22 Feb 2016 11:55:29 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*r:4.76, vogt, dominik, sk:vogt@li X-HELO: e06smtp16.uk.ibm.com Received: from e06smtp16.uk.ibm.com (HELO e06smtp16.uk.ibm.com) (195.75.94.112) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (CAMELLIA256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 11:55:26 +0000 Received: from localhost by e06smtp16.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 11:55:23 -0000 Received: from d06dlp01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.20.13) by e06smtp16.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.146) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 11:55:22 -0000 X-IBM-Helo: d06dlp01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com X-IBM-MailFrom: vogt@linux.vnet.ibm.com X-IBM-RcptTo: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay13.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.198]) by d06dlp01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FEE617D8056 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 11:55:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av06.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av06.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.217]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id u1MBtLtW3473882 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 11:55:21 GMT Received: from d06av06.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d06av06.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id u1MBtDnF019848 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 06:55:13 -0500 Received: from bl3ahm9f.de.ibm.com (dyn-9-152-212-196.boeblingen.de.ibm.com [9.152.212.196]) by d06av06.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id u1MBtDe7019832; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 06:55:13 -0500 Received: from dvogt by bl3ahm9f.de.ibm.com with local (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1aXp56-00070N-Fm; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 12:55:12 +0100 Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 11:55:00 -0000 From: Dominik Vogt To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Andreas Krebbel Subject: Re: [PING 2, PATCH] S/390: Reduce accuracy of bessel_6.f90. Message-ID: <20160222115512.GA26824@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: vogt@linux.vnet.ibm.com Mail-Followup-To: vogt@linux.vnet.ibm.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Andreas Krebbel References: <20160111144056.GB5221@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160111144056.GB5221@linux.vnet.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 16022211-0025-0000-0000-000009147C70 X-SW-Source: 2016-02/txt/msg01449.txt.bz2 On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 03:40:56PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: > Another patch reducing the accuracy required in the bessel_6 test. > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog > > * gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90: Reduce accuracy for S/390. > >From 70a35dd6f6bf906d8e5907667ad0f04f981a61ac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Dominik Vogt > Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 15:36:38 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH] S/390: Reduce accuracy of bessel_6.f90. > > --- > gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90 | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90 > index e0220f7..da917ff 100644 > --- a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90 > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90 > @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ > implicit none > real,parameter :: values(*) = [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 0.9, 1.8,2.0,3.0,4.0,4.25,8.0,34.53, 475.78] > real,parameter :: myeps(size(values)) = epsilon(0.0) & > - * [2, 7, 5, 6, 9, 12, 12, 7, 7, 8, 92, 15 ] > + * [2, 7, 5, 6, 9, 12, 12, 7, 7, 8, 98, 15 ] > ! The following is sufficient for me - the values above are a bit > ! more tolerant > ! * [0, 5, 3, 4, 6, 7, 7, 5, 5, 6, 66, 4 ] > -- > 2.3.0 > Ciao Dominik ^_^ ^_^ -- Dominik Vogt IBM Germany