From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-423296-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 30226 invoked by alias); 16 Mar 2016 00:07:33 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 30206 invoked by uid 89); 16 Mar 2016 00:07:32 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=4gb, cpp, H*F:U*dj
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 00:07:31 +0000
Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24])	by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B0F665400	for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 00:07:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from greed.delorie.com (ovpn-113-79.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.79])	by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u2G07Tix015817	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO);	Tue, 15 Mar 2016 20:07:30 -0400
Received: from greed.delorie.com (greed.delorie.com [127.0.0.1])	by greed.delorie.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u2G07SoJ000539;	Tue, 15 Mar 2016 20:07:28 -0400
Received: (from dj@localhost)	by greed.delorie.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id u2G07StC000537;	Tue, 15 Mar 2016 20:07:28 -0400
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 00:07:00 -0000
Message-Id: <201603160007.u2G07StC000537@greed.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
To: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
CC: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
In-reply-to: <56E88D50.3000809@redhat.com> (message from Richard Henderson on	Tue, 15 Mar 2016 15:31:44 -0700)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix compiling large files
References: <201603110420.u2B4KQ70018134@greed.delorie.com> <56E88179.6010805@redhat.com> <56E88D50.3000809@redhat.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2016-03/txt/msg00868.txt.bz2


> At this point we usually have a PR to go with all stage4
> changes.  But a meaningful PR is difficult to create, since
> the attachment would be too large.  Perhaps a generator could
> be created, but since it wouldn't go in the testsuite it seems
> like a waste of time.
> 
> Thoughts?

CPP macros grow exponentially, we could do it there, if we can get it
to preserve (inject?) line breaks.  But I wouldn't want to be the poor
developer on a 4Gb 32-bit system trying to run it...