From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 66919 invoked by alias); 17 Mar 2016 14:24:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 66902 invoked by uid 89); 17 Mar 2016 14:24:22 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 14:24:21 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F57964386 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 14:24:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (ovpn-113-25.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.25]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u2HEOJRF029999 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 17 Mar 2016 10:24:20 -0400 Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u2HEOHhL023853; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 15:24:18 +0100 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u2HEOGH3023852; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 15:24:16 +0100 Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 14:24:00 -0000 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Jason Merrill Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Patch ping Message-ID: <20160317142416.GM3017@tucnak.redhat.com> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-03/txt/msg01002.txt.bz2 Hi! I'd like to ping a C++ PR70144 patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-03/msg00653.html Since then, Zdenek has filed another PR with __builtin_constant_p (foo) where foo is FUNCTION_DECL, and only the above version fixes that, not the other one. Jakub