public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>
To: Patrick Palka <patrick@parcs.ath.cx>
Cc: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>,
	GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Avoid needless unsharing during constexpr evaluation (PR c++/70452)
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2016 07:12:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160408071201.GA310@x4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.11.1604061819540.2715@idea>

On 2016.04.06 at 18:25 -0400, Patrick Palka wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Apr 2016, Patrick Palka wrote:
> Here is a safer and simpler approach that just walks the expression
> being unshared to try to find a CONSTRUCTOR node.  If it finds one, then
> we unshare the whole expression.  Otherwise we return the original
> expression.  It should be completely safe to avoid unsharing an
> expression if it contains no CONSTRUCTOR nodes.
> 
> gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
> 
> 	PR c++/70452
> 	* constexpr.c (find_constructor): New function.
> 	(unshare_constructor): New function.
> 	(cxx_eval_call_expression): Use unshare_constructor instead of
> 	unshare_expr.
> 	(find_array_ctor_elt): Likewise.
> 	(cxx_eval_vec_init_1): Likewise.
> 	(cxx_eval_store_expression): Likewise.
> 	(cxx_eval_constant_expression): Likewise.

This patch causes: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70590

-- 
Markus

      parent reply	other threads:[~2016-04-08  7:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-06 16:52 Patrick Palka
2016-04-06 17:17 ` Richard Biener
2016-04-06 17:36   ` Patrick Palka
2016-04-06 22:25     ` Patrick Palka
2016-04-07 12:44       ` Jason Merrill
2016-04-08  7:12       ` Markus Trippelsdorf [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160408071201.GA310@x4 \
    --to=markus@trippelsdorf.de \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jason@redhat.com \
    --cc=patrick@parcs.ath.cx \
    --cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).