From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 60305 invoked by alias); 4 May 2016 13:19:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 60295 invoked by uid 89); 4 May 2016 13:19:19 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 04 May 2016 13:19:18 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80A9E3B747; Wed, 4 May 2016 13:19:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (ovpn-204-17.brq.redhat.com [10.40.204.17]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u44DJDk0014059 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 4 May 2016 09:19:15 -0400 Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 13:19:00 -0000 From: Marek Polacek To: Bernd Schmidt Cc: Jakub Jelinek , GCC Patches , Joseph Myers Subject: Re: C/C++ PATCH to add -Wdangling-else option Message-ID: <20160504131913.GK5348@redhat.com> References: <20160413141444.GT28445@redhat.com> <570E6218.6020503@redhat.com> <20160413151612.GS19207@tucnak.redhat.com> <20160426123201.GG28445@redhat.com> <20160426123924.GT26501@tucnak.zalov.cz> <571F671D.1010701@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <571F671D.1010701@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) X-SW-Source: 2016-05/txt/msg00296.txt.bz2 On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 03:03:25PM +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote: > On 04/26/2016 02:39 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > I support that change, and -Wparentheses will still enable this, it just > > gives more fine-grained control and be in line with what clang does. > > > > Bernd, how much are you against this change? > > Don't really care that much, I just don't quite see the point. Don't let me > stop you though. So Joseph, what do you think about this patch? :) Marek