From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11166 invoked by alias); 18 May 2016 18:11:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11147 invoked by uid 89); 18 May 2016 18:11:54 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: gate.crashing.org Received: from gate.crashing.org (HELO gate.crashing.org) (63.228.1.57) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 18 May 2016 18:11:44 +0000 Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u4IIBevU024419; Wed, 18 May 2016 13:11:40 -0500 Received: (from segher@localhost) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id u4IIBeuV024415; Wed, 18 May 2016 13:11:40 -0500 Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 18:11:00 -0000 From: Segher Boessenkool To: "H.J. Lu" Cc: GCC Patches Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] function: Factor out make_*logue_seq Message-ID: <20160518181139.GA24289@gate.crashing.org> References: <213485283eede9da12b217737d95fc8f5c4be442.1463428211.git.segher@kernel.crashing.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-05/txt/msg01397.txt.bz2 On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 10:17:32AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 6:09 PM, Segher Boessenkool > wrote: > > Make new functions make_split_prologue_seq, make_prologue_seq, and > > make_epilogue_seq. > > > > Tested as in the previous patch; is this okay for trunk? > > > > > > Segher > > > > > > 2016-05-16 Segher Boessenkool > > > > * function.c (make_split_prologue_seq, make_prologue_seq, > > make_epilogue_seq): New functions, factored out from... > > (thread_prologue_and_epilogue_insns): Here. > > > > It breaks x86: Are you sure it is this patch causing it? As noted, it was tested on x86. Segher