From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-427654-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 114495 invoked by alias); 18 May 2016 18:35:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 114480 invoked by uid 89); 18 May 2016 18:35:22 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=
X-HELO: gate.crashing.org
Received: from gate.crashing.org (HELO gate.crashing.org) (63.228.1.57) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 18 May 2016 18:35:21 +0000
Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])	by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u4IIZHoG026228;	Wed, 18 May 2016 13:35:17 -0500
Received: (from segher@localhost)	by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id u4IIZHA6026224;	Wed, 18 May 2016 13:35:17 -0500
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 18:35:00 -0000
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] function: Factor out make_*logue_seq
Message-ID: <20160518183516.GB24289@gate.crashing.org>
References: <213485283eede9da12b217737d95fc8f5c4be442.1463428211.git.segher@kernel.crashing.org> <d3064210448ea1d2d7758a3a34e554902333eef2.1463428211.git.segher@kernel.crashing.org> <CAMe9rOqs2BsvHNmCgRXDtpOZwxKLotd2xw_4B9oKEsx-qft6Ag@mail.gmail.com> <20160518181139.GA24289@gate.crashing.org> <CAMe9rOrQmt-avt-NSnRnQxmnL5g6TfJtPUMnY-MLfp_WuwyYCw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAMe9rOrQmt-avt-NSnRnQxmnL5g6TfJtPUMnY-MLfp_WuwyYCw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2016-05/txt/msg01403.txt.bz2

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:20:29AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> >> >         * function.c (make_split_prologue_seq, make_prologue_seq,
> >> >         make_epilogue_seq): New functions, factored out from...
> >> >         (thread_prologue_and_epilogue_insns): Here.
> >>
> >> It breaks x86:
> >
> > Are you sure it is this patch causing it?  As noted, it was tested on x86.
> 
> I am pretty sure.  How did you test it on x86?

"make -k check".  I'll test 32-bit now.


Segher