From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 87186 invoked by alias); 19 May 2016 07:16:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 85609 invoked by uid 89); 19 May 2016 07:16:35 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 19 May 2016 07:16:34 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C0477F6A2; Thu, 19 May 2016 07:16:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (ovpn-116-88.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.88]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u4J7GVCG010661 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 19 May 2016 03:16:32 -0400 Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u4J7GT4h014064; Thu, 19 May 2016 09:16:30 +0200 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u4J7GRE8014063; Thu, 19 May 2016 09:16:27 +0200 Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 07:16:00 -0000 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Segher Boessenkool Cc: "H.J. Lu" , GCC Patches Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] function: Factor out make_*logue_seq Message-ID: <20160519071626.GY28550@tucnak.redhat.com> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: <213485283eede9da12b217737d95fc8f5c4be442.1463428211.git.segher@kernel.crashing.org> <20160518181139.GA24289@gate.crashing.org> <20160518183516.GB24289@gate.crashing.org> <20160518221325.GB8384@gate.crashing.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160518221325.GB8384@gate.crashing.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-05/txt/msg01431.txt.bz2 On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 05:13:25PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 01:35:16PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:20:29AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote: > > > >> > * function.c (make_split_prologue_seq, make_prologue_seq, > > > >> > make_epilogue_seq): New functions, factored out from... > > > >> > (thread_prologue_and_epilogue_insns): Here. > > > >> > > > >> It breaks x86: > > > > > > > > Are you sure it is this patch causing it? As noted, it was tested on x86. > > > > > > I am pretty sure. How did you test it on x86? > > > > "make -k check". I'll test 32-bit now. > > Actually, it also fails on 64 bit. It passed my testing because it does > not fail together with patch 3/3, and does not fail on powerpc at all. If 3/3 isn't approved soon, can you please revert the problematic commit until it is if that patch can't work right on its own and needs the other patch too)? The trunk is in terrible state right now at least on x86_64/i686-linux, various tests hang forever (e.g. some cleanup-* tests) and there are hundreds of failures, making it impossible to do proper regression testing. Jakub