From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5231 invoked by alias); 19 May 2016 07:41:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5209 invoked by uid 89); 19 May 2016 07:41:56 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=2016-05-19 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 19 May 2016 07:41:45 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE30385543; Thu, 19 May 2016 07:41:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (ovpn-116-88.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.88]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u4J7fhq6026539 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 19 May 2016 03:41:44 -0400 Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u4J7ffqK014120; Thu, 19 May 2016 09:41:41 +0200 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u4J7fe74014119; Thu, 19 May 2016 09:41:40 +0200 Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 07:41:00 -0000 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Segher Boessenkool Cc: "H.J. Lu" , GCC Patches Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] function: Factor out make_*logue_seq Message-ID: <20160519074140.GZ28550@tucnak.redhat.com> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: <213485283eede9da12b217737d95fc8f5c4be442.1463428211.git.segher@kernel.crashing.org> <20160518181139.GA24289@gate.crashing.org> <20160518183516.GB24289@gate.crashing.org> <20160518221325.GB8384@gate.crashing.org> <20160519071626.GY28550@tucnak.redhat.com> <20160519072815.GA6926@gate.crashing.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160519072815.GA6926@gate.crashing.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-05/txt/msg01434.txt.bz2 On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 02:28:15AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > The following fixes it, tested on x86_64-linux. Is it okay for trunk? > > (It only happens for targets that have a splitter gated by epilogue_done > for their eh_return pattern). > > > Segher > > > 2016-05-19 Segher Boessenkool > > * function.c (thread_prologue_and_epilogue_insn): Move the > "goto epilogue_done" one block later. Ok, thanks. Jakub