Re: [RFA 1/2]: Don't ignore target_header_dir when deciding inhibit_libc

["Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>]

Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
> On 07/04/16 10:30, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
> > On 17/03/16 16:33, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
> >> On 23/10/15 12:31, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> >>> On 10/12/2015 11:58 AM, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Index: gcc/configure.ac
> >>>> ===================================================================
> >>>> --- gcc/configure.ac    (revision 228530)
> >>>> +++ gcc/configure.ac    (working copy)
> >>>> @@ -1993,7 +1993,7 @@ elif test "x$TARGET_SYSTEM_ROOT" != x; t
> >>>>   fi
> >>>>
> >>>>   if test x$host != x$target || test "x$TARGET_SYSTEM_ROOT" != x; then
> >>>> -  if test "x$with_headers" != x; then
> >>>> +  if test "x$with_headers" != x && test "x$with_headers" != xyes; then
> >>>>       target_header_dir=$with_headers
> >>>>     elif test "x$with_sysroot" = x; then
> >>>>      
> >>>> target_header_dir="${test_exec_prefix}/${target_noncanonical}/sys-include"
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> I'm missing the beginning of this conversation, but this looks like a
> >>> reasonable change (avoiding target_header_dir=yes for --with-headers).
> >>> So, approved.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Bernd
> >>>
> >> Hi there,
> >>
> >> I was wondering why this never made it to trunk. I am currently running
> >> into an issue that this patch would fix.

Seems I never actually checked this in, even though it was approved.
Thanks for the reminder, I've now checked the patch in.

Bye,
Ulrich

-- 
  Dr. Ulrich Weigand
  GNU/Linux compilers and toolchain
  Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com