From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-430565-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 78819 invoked by alias); 27 Jun 2016 21:35:40 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 78801 invoked by uid 89); 27 Jun 2016 21:35:39 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=
X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients
X-HELO: gate.crashing.org
Received: from gate.crashing.org (HELO gate.crashing.org) (63.228.1.57) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 21:35:31 +0000
Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])	by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u5RLZHDg030728;	Mon, 27 Jun 2016 16:35:18 -0500
Received: (from segher@localhost)	by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id u5RLZGD4030727;	Mon, 27 Jun 2016 16:35:16 -0500
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 21:38:00 -0000
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Bill Schmidt <wschmidt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,        GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, fortran@gcc.gnu.org,        jason@redhat.com, richard.earnshaw@arm.com, nickc@redhat.com,        ramana.radhakrishnan@arm.com, marcus.shawcroft@arm.com,        dje.gcc@gmail.com, meissner@linux.vnet.ibm.com,        murphyp@linux.vnet.ibm.com, bje@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Ping Re: Implement C _FloatN, _FloatNx types [version 3]
Message-ID: <20160627213516.GB27655@gate.crashing.org>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1606211202040.4526@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1606211738200.31330@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1606231418120.21240@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1606271720270.7438@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <6016E66D-2F43-4940-8289-C7AFA90112C6@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1606272121580.3978@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1606272121580.3978@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2016-06/txt/msg01838.txt.bz2

On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 09:22:54PM +0000, Joseph Myers wrote:
> > > Ping.  This patch 
> > > <https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg01685.html> is pending 
> > > review.  Built-in functions are available in the followup patch 
> > > <https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg01702.html>.
> > 
> > I can't ack the patch, but the rs6000 bits of your original patch look fine.
> > I didn't mean to ask you to change those -- I hadn't read the patch
> > and was just commenting on your description of the patch, and I realize
> > now that I wasn't careful in my use of language.  I apologize for the
> > miscommunication there.  We should keep the check on
> > FLOAT128_IEEE_P to determine which mode is __float128 for now,
> > until the whole issue of two 128-bit floats is behind us.
> 
> In that case, consider the relevant part of patch version 1 to be 
> substituted into version 3 for the rest of the review.

The rs6000 part is approved, then.

Thanks,


Segher