public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: dje.gcc@gmail.com
Subject: Re: PING x2  Re: [PATCH 0/9] separate shrink-wrapping
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2016 10:16:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160707101627.GA20074@gate.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160627235101.GF27655@gate.crashing.org>

Ping.

On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 06:51:01PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Ping.
> 
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 01:47:31AM +0000, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > This patch series introduces separate shrink-wrapping.
> > 
> > There are many things the prologue/epilogue of a function do, and most of
> > those things can be done independently.  For example, most of the time,
> > for many targets, the save of callee-saved registers can be done later
> > than the "main" prologue.
> > 
> > Doing so helps quite a bit because the prologue is expensive for functions
> > that do not need everything it does done for every path through the
> > function; often, the hot paths do not need much at all, e.g. not those
> > things the prologue needs to do for the function to call other functions.
> > 
> > The first patch creates a command-line flag, some hooks, a status flag
> > ("is this function wrapped separately", used by later passes), and
> > documentation for these things.
> > 
> > The next six patches are to prevent later passes from mishandling the
> > epilogue instructions that now appear before the epilogue: mostly, you
> > cannot do much to instructions with a REG_CFA_RESTORE note without
> > confusing dwarf2cfi.  The cprop one is for prologue instructions.
> > 
> > Then, the main patch.  And finally a patch for PowerPC that implements
> > separate wrapping for GPRs and LR.
> > 
> > Tested on powerpc64-linux (-m32/-m64, -mlra/-mno-lra), and on
> > powerpc64le-linux.  Previous versions of this series also tested on
> > x86_64-linux.
> > 
> > Is this okay for trunk?
> > 
> > 
> > Segher
> > 
> > 
> > Segher Boessenkool (9):
> >   separate shrink-wrap: New command-line flag, status flag, hooks, and doc
> >   cfgcleanup: Don't confuse CFI when -fshrink-wrap-separate
> >   dce: Don't dead-code delete separately wrapped restores
> >   regrename: Don't rename restores
> >   regrename: Don't run if function was separately shrink-wrapped
> >   sel-sched: Don't mess with register restores
> >   cprop: Leave RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P instructions alone
> >   shrink-wrap: shrink-wrapping for separate concerns
> >   rs6000: Separate shrink-wrapping
> > 
> >  gcc/cfgcleanup.c           |   5 +
> >  gcc/common.opt             |   4 +
> >  gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c | 257 ++++++++++++++++--
> >  gcc/dce.c                  |   9 +
> >  gcc/doc/invoke.texi        |  11 +-
> >  gcc/doc/tm.texi            |  53 ++++
> >  gcc/doc/tm.texi.in         |  29 ++
> >  gcc/emit-rtl.h             |   4 +
> >  gcc/function.c             |  15 +-
> >  gcc/regcprop.c             |   3 +
> >  gcc/regrename.c            |  12 +-
> >  gcc/sel-sched-ir.c         |   1 +
> >  gcc/shrink-wrap.c          | 647 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  gcc/shrink-wrap.h          |   1 +
> >  gcc/target.def             |  56 ++++
> >  15 files changed, 1088 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> > 
> > -- 
> > 1.9.3

      reply	other threads:[~2016-07-07 10:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-08  1:48 Segher Boessenkool
2016-06-08  1:48 ` [PATCH 2/9] cfgcleanup: Don't confuse CFI when -fshrink-wrap-separate Segher Boessenkool
2016-06-08  1:48 ` [PATCH 1/9] separate shrink-wrap: New command-line flag, status flag, hooks, and doc Segher Boessenkool
2016-06-08  1:48 ` [PATCH 3/9] dce: Don't dead-code delete separately wrapped restores Segher Boessenkool
2016-06-08  1:53 ` [PATCH 6/9] sel-sched: Don't mess with register restores Segher Boessenkool
2016-06-08  1:53 ` [PATCH 4/9] regrename: Don't rename restores Segher Boessenkool
2016-06-08  1:54 ` [PATCH 7/9] cprop: Leave RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P instructions alone Segher Boessenkool
2016-06-08  1:54 ` [PATCH 5/9] regrename: Don't run if function was separately shrink-wrapped Segher Boessenkool
2016-06-08  9:18   ` Bernd Schmidt
2016-09-09 18:41     ` Jeff Law
2016-09-09 20:56       ` Segher Boessenkool
2016-09-09 23:12         ` Jeff Law
2016-09-10  6:59           ` Segher Boessenkool
2016-09-12 16:36             ` Jeff Law
     [not found]               ` <CAGWvny=fHHZtKF4_D2098+3PTPPzxtg3EjKDWHyJwUxz8g_tEA@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]                 ` <CAGWvnymZVg_FR_PHqhwkgrAkHDntVMEiG4shfst_GA9OnZKvWg@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]                   ` <CAGWvnykQ3oz0UpcF6U1WYivbJww65h2EH5n3FocQ8JGY9hrOrA@mail.gmail.com>
2016-09-12 17:04                     ` Jeff Law
2016-09-14 13:08               ` Segher Boessenkool
2016-09-14 13:18                 ` Bernd Schmidt
2016-09-14 14:01                   ` Segher Boessenkool
2016-09-14 14:54                     ` Bernd Schmidt
2016-09-14 16:33                       ` Segher Boessenkool
2016-09-14 19:10                       ` Jeff Law
2016-09-14 17:55                     ` Jeff Law
2016-09-14 19:13                       ` Segher Boessenkool
2016-09-14 19:36                         ` Jeff Law
2016-09-14 18:21                 ` Jeff Law
2016-09-14 19:13                   ` Segher Boessenkool
2016-09-14 19:38                     ` Jeff Law
2016-09-14 22:34                       ` Segher Boessenkool
2016-09-15 17:28                         ` Jeff Law
2016-09-19 17:11                       ` Segher Boessenkool
2016-09-14 20:04                     ` Jeff Law
2016-09-14 22:51                       ` Segher Boessenkool
2016-06-08  2:03 ` [PATCH 8/9] shrink-wrap: shrink-wrapping for separate concerns Segher Boessenkool
2016-07-15 12:42   ` Bernd Schmidt
2016-07-18 16:34     ` Segher Boessenkool
2016-07-18 17:03       ` Bernd Schmidt
2016-07-19 14:46         ` Segher Boessenkool
2016-07-19 14:49           ` Bernd Schmidt
2016-07-19 15:35             ` Segher Boessenkool
2016-07-20 11:23               ` Bernd Schmidt
2016-07-20 15:06                 ` Segher Boessenkool
2016-06-08  2:04 ` [PATCH 9/9] rs6000: Separate shrink-wrapping Segher Boessenkool
2016-06-08 11:56 ` [PATCH 0/9] separate shrink-wrapping Bernd Schmidt
2016-06-08 12:45   ` Eric Botcazou
2016-06-08 15:16   ` Segher Boessenkool
2016-06-08 16:43     ` Bernd Schmidt
2016-06-08 17:26       ` Segher Boessenkool
2016-06-29 23:06         ` Bernd Schmidt
2016-06-29 23:24           ` Segher Boessenkool
2016-07-04  8:57             ` Segher Boessenkool
2016-06-14 21:24       ` Segher Boessenkool
2016-07-08 10:42         ` Bernd Schmidt
2016-07-08 12:11           ` Segher Boessenkool
2016-07-08 13:16             ` David Malcolm
2016-07-08 13:45               ` Segher Boessenkool
2016-07-08 14:35                 ` Bill Schmidt
2016-06-09 16:12 ` Jeff Law
2016-06-09 19:57   ` Segher Boessenkool
2016-06-28  0:22 ` PING " Segher Boessenkool
2016-07-07 10:16   ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160707101627.GA20074@gate.crashing.org \
    --to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=dje.gcc@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).