From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 76994 invoked by alias); 12 Jul 2016 12:55:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 76975 invoked by uid 89); 12 Jul 2016 12:55:26 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: gate.crashing.org Received: from gate.crashing.org (HELO gate.crashing.org) (63.228.1.57) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 12:55:25 +0000 Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u6CCtLdb023116; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 07:55:21 -0500 Received: (from segher@localhost) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id u6CCtKXj023115; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 07:55:20 -0500 Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 12:55:00 -0000 From: Segher Boessenkool To: Bernd Schmidt Cc: Richard Biener , Michael Meissner , GCC Patches , David Edelsohn , Bill Schmidt Subject: Re: [PATCH], PowerPC support to enable -mlra and/or -mfloat128 Message-ID: <20160712125520.GE13551@gate.crashing.org> References: <20160711200701.GA21095@ibm-tiger.the-meissners.org> <20160712121559.GC13551@gate.crashing.org> <7f93c3f9-6e15-257e-f573-43f2c14127fe@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7f93c3f9-6e15-257e-f573-43f2c14127fe@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-07/txt/msg00634.txt.bz2 On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 02:40:28PM +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote: > On 07/12/2016 02:15 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > >How can LRA ever be made default for all targets without breaking those > >that do not want to change? > > LRA advocates would have to fix the issues with it that prevent it from > being usable on certain targets. That would be the case if the plan was to remove reload. But the current proposal is only to change the default, and the affected targets can easily implement the hook (to say "no") if LRA won't work for them. Segher