* PR fortran/71859 -- Patch
@ 2016-07-28 0:19 Steve Kargl
2016-07-28 7:54 ` Andre Vehreschild
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Steve Kargl @ 2016-07-28 0:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: fortran, gcc-patches
Patch is self-explanatory. OK?
2016-07-26 Steven G. Kargl <kargl@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/71859
* check.c(numeric_check): Prevent ICE. Issue error for invalid
subroutine as an actual argument when numeric argument is expected.
2016-07-26 Steven G. Kargl <kargl@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/71859
* gfortran.dg/pr71859.f90: New test.
* gfortran.dg/intrinsic_numeric_arg.f: Update error message.
* gfortran.dg/coarray_collectives_1.f90: Ditto.
Index: gcc/fortran/check.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/fortran/check.c (revision 238665)
+++ gcc/fortran/check.c (working copy)
@@ -72,6 +72,11 @@ type_check (gfc_expr *e, int n, bt type)
static bool
numeric_check (gfc_expr *e, int n)
{
+ /* Users sometime use a subroutine designator as an actual argument to
+ an intrinsic subprogram that expects an argument with a numeric type. */
+ if (e->symtree && e->symtree->n.sym->attr.subroutine)
+ goto bandaid;
+
if (gfc_numeric_ts (&e->ts))
return true;
@@ -86,7 +91,9 @@ numeric_check (gfc_expr *e, int n)
return true;
}
- gfc_error ("%qs argument of %qs intrinsic at %L must be a numeric type",
+bandaid:
+
+ gfc_error ("%qs argument of %qs intrinsic at %L must have a numeric type",
gfc_current_intrinsic_arg[n]->name, gfc_current_intrinsic,
&e->where);
Index: gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr71859.f90
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr71859.f90 (nonexistent)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr71859.f90 (working copy)
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+! { dg-do compile }
+program p
+ call s(1)
+ x = abs(s) ! { dg-error "must have a numeric type" }
+end
+subroutine s(n)
+ print *, n
+end
Index: gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/intrinsic_numeric_arg.f
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/intrinsic_numeric_arg.f (revision 238665)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/intrinsic_numeric_arg.f (working copy)
@@ -4,6 +4,6 @@
LOGICAL Z
CHARACTER A
REAL R
- R = ABS(Z) ! { dg-error " must be a numeric type" }
- R = ABS(A) ! { dg-error " must be a numeric type" }
+ R = ABS(Z) ! { dg-error " must have a numeric type" }
+ R = ABS(A) ! { dg-error " must have a numeric type" }
END
Index: gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/coarray_collectives_1.f90
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/coarray_collectives_1.f90 (revision 238665)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/coarray_collectives_1.f90 (working copy)
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ program test
integer(8) :: i8
character(len=19, kind=4) :: msg4
- call co_sum("abc") ! { dg-error "must be a numeric type" }
+ call co_sum("abc") ! { dg-error "must have a numeric type" }
call co_max(cmplx(1.0,0.0)) ! { dg-error "shall be of type integer, real or character" }
call co_min(cmplx(0.0,1.0)) ! { dg-error "shall be of type integer, real or character" }
--
Steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: PR fortran/71859 -- Patch
2016-07-28 0:19 PR fortran/71859 -- Patch Steve Kargl
@ 2016-07-28 7:54 ` Andre Vehreschild
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andre Vehreschild @ 2016-07-28 7:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steve Kargl; +Cc: fortran, gcc-patches
Hi Karl,
see below for comment:
On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 17:19:42 -0700
Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
> Patch is self-explanatory. OK?
>
> 2016-07-26 Steven G. Kargl <kargl@gcc.gnu.org>
>
> PR fortran/71859
> * check.c(numeric_check): Prevent ICE. Issue error for
> invalid subroutine as an actual argument when numeric argument is
> expected.
>
> 2016-07-26 Steven G. Kargl <kargl@gcc.gnu.org>
>
> PR fortran/71859
> * gfortran.dg/pr71859.f90: New test.
> * gfortran.dg/intrinsic_numeric_arg.f: Update error message.
> * gfortran.dg/coarray_collectives_1.f90: Ditto.
>
> Index: gcc/fortran/check.c
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc/fortran/check.c (revision 238665)
> +++ gcc/fortran/check.c (working copy)
> @@ -72,6 +72,11 @@ type_check (gfc_expr *e, int n, bt type)
> static bool
> numeric_check (gfc_expr *e, int n)
> {
> + /* Users sometime use a subroutine designator as an actual
> argument to
> + an intrinsic subprogram that expects an argument with a numeric
> type. */
> + if (e->symtree && e->symtree->n.sym->attr.subroutine)
> + goto bandaid;
> +
> if (gfc_numeric_ts (&e->ts))
> return true;
>
> @@ -86,7 +91,9 @@ numeric_check (gfc_expr *e, int n)
> return true;
> }
>
> - gfc_error ("%qs argument of %qs intrinsic at %L must be a numeric
> type",
> +bandaid:
Why bandaid? I would prefer error as label here, like it is done in
several places in the code. Being a non-English-native I had to look up
band-aid first to figure what it means. So that id is not intuitive to
me.
Besides that is the patch ok with me. Thanks.
- Andre
> +
> + gfc_error ("%qs argument of %qs intrinsic at %L must have a
> numeric type", gfc_current_intrinsic_arg[n]->name,
> gfc_current_intrinsic, &e->where);
>
> Index: gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr71859.f90
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr71859.f90 (nonexistent)
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr71859.f90 (working copy)
> @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
> +! { dg-do compile }
> +program p
> + call s(1)
> + x = abs(s) ! { dg-error "must have a numeric type" }
> +end
> +subroutine s(n)
> + print *, n
> +end
> Index: gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/intrinsic_numeric_arg.f
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/intrinsic_numeric_arg.f
> (revision 238665) +++
> gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/intrinsic_numeric_arg.f (working
> copy) @@ -4,6 +4,6 @@ LOGICAL Z
> CHARACTER A
> REAL R
> - R = ABS(Z) ! { dg-error " must be a numeric type" }
> - R = ABS(A) ! { dg-error " must be a numeric type" }
> + R = ABS(Z) ! { dg-error " must have a numeric type" }
> + R = ABS(A) ! { dg-error " must have a numeric type" }
> END
> Index: gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/coarray_collectives_1.f90
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/coarray_collectives_1.f90
> (revision 238665) +++
> gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/coarray_collectives_1.f90 (working
> copy) @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ program test integer(8) :: i8
> character(len=19, kind=4) :: msg4
>
> - call co_sum("abc") ! { dg-error "must be a numeric type" }
> + call co_sum("abc") ! { dg-error "must have a numeric type" }
> call co_max(cmplx(1.0,0.0)) ! { dg-error "shall be of type
> integer, real or character" } call co_min(cmplx(0.0,1.0)) !
> { dg-error "shall be of type integer, real or character" }
>
>
--
Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-07-28 7:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-07-28 0:19 PR fortran/71859 -- Patch Steve Kargl
2016-07-28 7:54 ` Andre Vehreschild
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).