From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-435468-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 16108 invoked by alias); 8 Sep 2016 11:06:47 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 16081 invoked by uid 89); 8 Sep 2016 11:06:46 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=memalign
X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Sep 2016 11:06:45 +0000
Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24])	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))	(No client certificate requested)	by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BF4C61E52;	Thu,  8 Sep 2016 11:06:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (ovpn-116-35.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.35])	by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u88B6gYZ025952;	Thu, 8 Sep 2016 07:06:42 -0400
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2016 11:18:00 -0000
From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
To: libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>,        gcc-patches List <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,        "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: RFA (libstdc++): PATCH to implement C++17 over-aligned new
Message-ID: <20160908110641.GB23306@redhat.com>
References: <CADzB+2kJRV14hZX1rGz5V_UCpSB7MdVQPh4OM=vYOsw6ZDUNkA@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1609080901360.3233@laptop-mg.saclay.inria.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1609080901360.3233@laptop-mg.saclay.inria.fr>
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.0 (2016-08-17)
X-SW-Source: 2016-09/txt/msg00431.txt.bz2

On 08/09/16 09:10 +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
>Do we want a generic fallback implementation (similar to 
>gcc/config/i386/gmm_malloc.h)? A windows version with _aligned_malloc 
>/ _aligned_free would also be possible.

Making it work for MinGW would be nice. If there are other targets
that don't support any of C11, POSIX-2001, or memalign then we can add
a generic fallback later, but I'm not sure it's worth doing now. It
might never be needed.