From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-435614-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 45336 invoked by alias); 10 Sep 2016 10:14:10 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 45279 invoked by uid 89); 10 Sep 2016 10:14:09 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=cry
X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 10 Sep 2016 10:14:08 +0000
Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27])	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))	(No client certificate requested)	by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65CE581253;	Sat, 10 Sep 2016 10:14:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (ovpn-116-49.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.49])	by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u8AAE5uf024103;	Sat, 10 Sep 2016 06:14:05 -0400
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2016 10:14:00 -0000
From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
To: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Cc: libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches List <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: RFA (libstdc++): PATCH to implement C++17 over-aligned new
Message-ID: <20160910101405.GF23306@redhat.com>
References: <CADzB+2kJRV14hZX1rGz5V_UCpSB7MdVQPh4OM=vYOsw6ZDUNkA@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1609080901360.3233@laptop-mg.saclay.inria.fr> <20160908110641.GB23306@redhat.com> <CADzB+2mMHsrPdL5u2NWb_wqwvNcTo-nOKLaJ-Nft6+Myo=++Ug@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CADzB+2mMHsrPdL5u2NWb_wqwvNcTo-nOKLaJ-Nft6+Myo=++Ug@mail.gmail.com>
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.0 (2016-08-17)
X-SW-Source: 2016-09/txt/msg00577.txt.bz2

On 09/09/16 17:20 -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
>OK, this is what I'm checking in; could someone test it on MinGW?

MSDN suggests we need <malloc.h> for _aligned_malloc, but I'm not
sure. Last time I tried to build and test MinGW it made me cry, and I
no longer have any access to Windows machines anyway.

But rather than trying to fix it blind let's wait for feedback and see
if it works for MinGW or not.