From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Burgess <andrew.burgess@embecosm.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Ping: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gcc: Remove unneeded global flag.
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 13:08:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160914130756.GP7282@tucnak.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160914130048.GC31794@embecosm.com>
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 02:00:48PM +0100, Andrew Burgess wrote:
> In an attempt to get this patch merged (as I still think that its
> correct) I've investigated, and documented a little more about how I
> think things currently work. I'm sure most people reading this will
> already know this, but hopefully, if my understanding is wrong someone
> can point it out.
I wonder if user_defined_section_attribute instead shouldn't be moved
into struct function and be handled as a per-function flag then.
Jakub
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-14 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-10 16:56 [PATCH 0/2] Remove user_defined_section_attribute global Andrew Burgess
2016-06-10 16:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] gcc: Remove unneeded global flag Andrew Burgess
2016-06-22 2:55 ` Jeff Law
2016-06-22 6:02 ` Jakub Jelinek
2016-06-29 19:33 ` Andrew Burgess
2016-09-14 13:05 ` Ping: " Andrew Burgess
2016-09-14 13:08 ` Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2016-09-15 14:30 ` Andrew Burgess
2016-10-28 15:58 ` Jeff Law
2016-10-28 16:15 ` Andrew Burgess
2016-11-03 12:01 ` Bernd Schmidt
2016-11-16 20:09 ` Andrew Burgess
2016-11-16 21:00 ` Mike Stump
2016-11-16 22:12 ` Andrew Burgess
2016-11-17 17:59 ` Jeff Law
2016-11-18 12:22 ` Christophe Lyon
2016-11-19 21:59 ` Andrew Burgess
2016-11-20 17:27 ` Mike Stump
2016-11-21 12:47 ` Christophe Lyon
2016-11-24 21:40 ` Andrew Burgess
2016-11-28 22:09 ` Jeff Law
2016-11-29 14:03 ` Andrew Burgess
2016-11-29 17:36 ` Jeff Law
2016-11-30 11:40 ` Andrew Burgess
2016-06-10 16:57 ` [PATCH 2/2] gcc: Update comment in bb-reorder.c Andrew Burgess
2016-06-22 2:59 ` Jeff Law
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160914130756.GP7282@tucnak.redhat.com \
--to=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=andrew.burgess@embecosm.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=law@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).