From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 122102 invoked by alias); 14 Sep 2016 13:46:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 122071 invoked by uid 89); 14 Sep 2016 13:46:58 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:562 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: gate.crashing.org Received: from gate.crashing.org (HELO gate.crashing.org) (63.228.1.57) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 13:46:57 +0000 Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u8EDkrL0008568; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 08:46:54 -0500 Received: (from segher@localhost) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id u8EDkqk2008561; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 08:46:52 -0500 Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 14:01:00 -0000 From: Segher Boessenkool To: Peter Bergner Cc: Jeff Law , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Put a TARGET_LRA_P into every target Message-ID: <20160914134651.GE4896@gate.crashing.org> References: <20160914103510.GA24835@gate.crashing.org> <5866b2df-5427-6e27-f44e-97147e190a9f@vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5866b2df-5427-6e27-f44e-97147e190a9f@vnet.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-09/txt/msg00834.txt.bz2 On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 07:46:13AM -0500, Peter Bergner wrote: > On 9/14/16 5:35 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > (I hope the wording is strong enough). > Maybe s/New ports should use LRA/New ports must use LRA/ ? Yeah maybe. Does anyone else have an opinion on this? Cc:ing gcc@... > >+ New ports should use LRA, and existing ports are encouraged to convert. > ^^ > extra space That is auto-generated, and not new :-) The various info backends do not seem to care (TeX doesn't, do any others?) Segher