public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
To: "François Dumont" <frs.dumont@gmail.com>
Cc: "libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org" <libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org>,
	       gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: debug container mutex association
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 11:55:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160926111623.GP17376@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160920085747.GD17376@redhat.com>

On 20/09/16 09:57 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>On 19/09/16 21:56 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
>>Hi
>>
>>   Following our conversation here is a much simpler patch. I just 
>>consider that all debug containers will have the same alignment.
>>
>>   Even if I submit this patch as a whole I will commit into pieces, 
>>at least one for the pure cleanup parts and one for the debug.cc 
>>change.
>>
>>   Among those changes there is:
>>-       __gnu_cxx::__scoped_lock(this->_M_get_mutex());
>>+       __gnu_cxx::__scoped_lock __l(this->_M_get_mutex());
>>
>>   I would appreciate if you could tell me what was happening with 
>>the initial expression. I don't understand why it is compiling. I 
>>even tried the same in debug.cc and started having compilation 
>>errors.
>>
>>   * include/debug/bitset (bitset::reference::reference(const _Base_ref&,
>>   bitset*)): Remove __unused__ attribute.
>>   * include/debug/safe_base.h (_Safe_iterator_base): Make
>>   _Safe_sequence_base a friend.
>>   (_Safe_iterator_base::_M_attach): Make protected.
>>   (_Safe_iterator_base::_M_attach_single): Likewise.
>>   (_Safe_iterator_base::_M_detach): Likewise.
>>   (_Safe_iterator_base::_M_detach_single): Likewise.
>>   (_Safe_sequence_base): Make _Safe_iterator_base a friend.
>>(_Safe_sequence_base::_Safe_sequence_base(_Safe_sequence_base&&)): New.
>>   (_Safe_sequence_base::_M_swap): Make protected.
>>   (_Safe_sequence_base::_M_attach): Make private.
>>   (_Safe_sequence_base::_M_attach_single): Likewise.
>>   (_Safe_sequence_base::_M_detach): Likewise.
>>   (_Safe_sequence_base::_M_detach_single): Likewise.
>>   * include/debug/safe_container.h
>>   (_Safe_container::_Safe_container(_Safe_container&&)): Make default.
>>   * include/debug/safe_iterator.h
>>   (_Safe_iterator::operator++()): Name __scoped_lock instance.
>>   * include/debug/safe_iterator.tcc: Remove trailing line.
>>   * include/debug/safe_unordered_base.h
>>   (_Safe_local_iterator_base::_M_attach): Make protected.
>>   (_Safe_local_iterator_base::_M_attach_single): Likewise.
>>   (_Safe_local_iterator_base::_M_detach): Likewise.
>>   (_Safe_local_iterator_base::_M_detach_single): Likewise.
>>   (_Safe_unordered_container_base): Make _Safe_local_iterator_base 
>>friend.
>>   (_Safe_unordered_container_base::_M_attach_local): Make private.
>>   (_Safe_unordered_container_base::_M_attach_local_single): Likewise.
>>   (_Safe_unordered_container_base::_M_detach_local): Likewise.
>>   (_Safe_unordered_container_base::_M_detach_local_single): Likewise.
>>   * src/c++11/debug.cc: Include debug/vector. Include cctype. Remove
>>   functional.
>>   (get_safe_base_mutex): Get mutex based on address lowest non nil bits.
>>   * testsuite/23_containers/vector/debug/mutex_association.cc: New.
>>
>>Tested under Linux x86_64.
>>
>>Ok to commit ?
>
>Yes, OK for trunk.  Thanks for revising it, I think this is a much
>bettter fix.

This caused a new FAIL:

FAIL: 23_containers/list/debug/invalidation/4.cc (test for excess errors)
UNRESOLVED: 23_containers/list/debug/invalidation/4.cc compilation failed to produce executable


  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-26 11:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-13 20:37 François Dumont
2016-09-14  9:01 ` Jonathan Wakely
2016-09-14 20:53   ` François Dumont
2016-09-15  9:15     ` Jonathan Wakely
2016-09-19 20:19       ` François Dumont
2016-09-20  8:58         ` Jonathan Wakely
2016-09-27 15:39           ` Jonathan Wakely
2016-09-27 21:14             ` François Dumont
2016-09-20  9:20         ` Jonathan Wakely
2016-09-26 11:55           ` Jonathan Wakely [this message]
2016-09-26 12:23         ` Andreas Schwab
2016-09-26 22:09           ` François Dumont
2016-09-27 10:32             ` Jonathan Wakely
2016-09-28 19:35               ` François Dumont
2016-09-28 19:47                 ` Jonathan Wakely
2017-12-29 16:10         ` Andreas Schwab

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160926111623.GP17376@redhat.com \
    --to=jwakely@redhat.com \
    --cc=frs.dumont@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).