From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27723 invoked by alias); 28 Sep 2016 21:51:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 27713 invoked by uid 89); 28 Sep 2016 21:51:33 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 21:51:32 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CDF6C008378 for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 21:51:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (ovpn-116-44.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.44]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u8SLpRrN032008 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 28 Sep 2016 17:51:29 -0400 Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u8SLpPAk027054; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 23:51:26 +0200 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u8SLpO46027053; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 23:51:24 +0200 Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 00:41:00 -0000 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Bernd Schmidt Cc: Jeff Law , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Patch ping Message-ID: <20160928215124.GO7282@tucnak.redhat.com> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: <20160928192450.GJ7282@tucnak.redhat.com> <788754ad-a27a-d64c-d1f2-a1f29de9805b@redhat.com> <20160928194748.GL7282@tucnak.redhat.com> <20160928214051.GN7282@tucnak.redhat.com> <4afc25ec-f164-f304-a806-a46638025dd7@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4afc25ec-f164-f304-a806-a46638025dd7@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-09/txt/msg02204.txt.bz2 On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:46:59PM +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote: > On 09/28/2016 11:40 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > >On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:17:55PM +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote: > >>On 09/28/2016 09:47 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > >>>And here are the 0 < var to var > 0 changes. Thoughts on those? > >> > >>I kind of meant it the other way round, so yeah, please install. > > > >Oops, sorry, shall I revert what I've committed then? > > No, I think it looks fine too, although I can't figure out why that one > block of code was moved. The intent was that each of the non-__*_chk builtins is followed by its __*_chk counterpart; without the patch that was almost the case except for that one exception. Jakub