From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Steven Bosscher <stevenb.gcc@gmail.com>
Cc: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>,
GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bb-reorder: Improve compgotos pass (PR71785)
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 13:41:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161102134059.GA28264@gate.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABu31nN0nVowQspRjnq3DiyWjetMR0ZjAdB+GdZwdW1NCwowfg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 11:39:20AM +0100, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 10:02 AM, Richard Biener
> <richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 4:35 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 04:09:48PM +0100, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 8:10 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >>> > + cfg_layout_finalize ();
> >>>
> >>> I don't think you have to go into/out-of cfglayout mode for each iteration.
> >>
> >> Yeah probably. I was too lazy :-) It needs the cleanup_cfg every
> >> iteration though, I was afraid that interacts.
> >
> > Ick. Why would it need a cfg-cleanup every iteration?
>
> I don't believe it needs a cleanup on every iteration. One cleanup at
> the end should work fine.
But as the comment there says:
/* Merge the duplicated blocks into predecessors, when possible. */
cleanup_cfg (0);
(this is not a new comment), and without merging blocks this whole
patch does zilch.
There is no need to create new basic blocks at all (can replace the
final branch in a block with a copy of the whole block it jumps to,
instead); and then it is painfully obvious that switching to layout
mode here is pointless, too.
Do you want me to do that?
Btw, this isn't quadratic anyway; it is a constant number (the maximal
length allowed of the block to copy) linear. Unless there are unboundedly
many forwarder blocks, which there shouldn't be, but I cannot prove that.
And on a testcase with 2000 cases (instead of the 4 in the testcase in
the PR) this pass takes less than 1% of the compiler runtime; and in
the normal cases (no computed gotos to unfactor) it does the same as
before.
Segher
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-02 13:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-30 19:11 Segher Boessenkool
2016-10-31 15:10 ` Steven Bosscher
2016-10-31 15:35 ` Segher Boessenkool
2016-11-02 9:02 ` Richard Biener
2016-11-02 10:40 ` Steven Bosscher
2016-11-02 13:41 ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]
2016-11-02 13:51 ` Richard Biener
2016-11-02 15:27 ` Segher Boessenkool
2016-11-03 8:29 ` Richard Biener
2016-11-03 15:47 ` Segher Boessenkool
2016-11-04 8:42 ` Richard Biener
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161102134059.GA28264@gate.crashing.org \
--to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
--cc=stevenb.gcc@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).