From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 93572 invoked by alias); 4 Nov 2016 00:58:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 93527 invoked by uid 89); 4 Nov 2016 00:57:59 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:558, HCc:D*fr X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: troutmask.apl.washington.edu Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (HELO troutmask.apl.washington.edu) (128.95.76.21) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Nov 2016 00:57:57 +0000 Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id uA40vtZU019530 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 3 Nov 2016 17:57:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id uA40vqqk019529; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 17:57:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2016 00:58:00 -0000 From: Steve Kargl To: Andre Vehreschild Cc: GCC-Patches-ML , GCC-Fortran-ML , Dominique Dhumieres Subject: Re: [PATCH, Fortran, v1] Restructure initialization of allocatable components Message-ID: <20161104005752.GA19485@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Reply-To: kargl@uw.edu References: <20161103141648.1c8c87c3@vepi2> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161103141648.1c8c87c3@vepi2> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) X-SW-Source: 2016-11/txt/msg00382.txt.bz2 On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 02:16:48PM +0100, Andre Vehreschild wrote: > > Bootstraps and regtests fine on x86_64-linux/F23. Ok for trunk? > > @Dominique: Would you give it a go on your open patch collection? Maybe it > fixes one PR, but I am not very hopeful, because the patch is merely removing > complexity instead of doing new things. > Andre, I did not see anything that looked dubious. I think it is OK to commit, but you may want to see if Paul has any comment. -- Steve