From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9183 invoked by alias); 15 Nov 2016 09:42:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 9172 invoked by uid 89); 15 Nov 2016 09:42:54 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_SEMBACKSCATTER autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*u:2009-12-10, H*UA:2009-12-10, department, our X-HELO: mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (HELO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com) (148.163.156.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 09:42:53 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098410.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.17/8.16.0.17) with SMTP id uAF9cUqp128416 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 04:42:50 -0500 Received: from e06smtp09.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp09.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.105]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 26qrbub3ns-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 04:42:50 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp09.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 09:42:48 -0000 Received: from d06dlp01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.20.13) by e06smtp09.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.139) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 09:42:47 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay10.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.195]) by d06dlp01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDADD17D805D for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 09:45:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av09.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av09.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.250]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id uAF9gkHi42205428 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 09:42:46 GMT Received: from d06av09.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d06av09.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id uAF9gkPd017306 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 02:42:46 -0700 Received: from oc5510024614.ibm.com (dyn-9-152-224-33.boeblingen.de.ibm.com [9.152.224.33]) by d06av09.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id uAF9gkX6017303; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 02:42:46 -0700 Received: by oc5510024614.ibm.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id A71B618F60; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 10:42:45 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 09:42:00 -0000 From: Dominik Vogt To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, David Edelsohn Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR77359: Properly align local variables in functions calling alloca. Reply-To: vogt@linux.vnet.ibm.com Mail-Followup-To: vogt@linux.vnet.ibm.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, David Edelsohn References: <20161103104044.GA8122@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20161110234702.GA21356@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20161111001757.GA2209@gate.crashing.org> <20161111085821.GA6100@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20161111201758.GA14906@gate.crashing.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161111201758.GA14906@gate.crashing.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10) X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 16111509-0036-0000-0000-0000025E66E6 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 16111509-0037-0000-0000-000013443A92 Message-Id: <20161115094245.GA8415@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2016-11-15_04:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1609300000 definitions=main-1611150179 X-SW-Source: 2016-11/txt/msg01410.txt.bz2 On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 02:17:58PM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 09:58:21AM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > > You say it needs more testing -- what testing? > > > > Regression testing on AIX (David has done this in reply to the > > original message), possibly also on 32-Bit Power, if that is a > > reasonable target. > > It is. I'll test powerpc64-linux -m32, and a crosscompiler for > powerpc-linux. > > Thanks for the patch. Please apply to trunk. Does it need backports > later? Depends on whether the Power/AIX folks think backports are necessary. We'll apply the patch to trunk; if a backport is desired later, David or someone else from IBM could do that (i.e. it's not necessary that our department commits further patches). Ciao Dominik ^_^ ^_^ -- Dominik Vogt IBM Germany