public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>
To: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PR 70965] Schedule extra pass_rebuild_cgraph_edges
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2016 13:11:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161125131050.GB4846@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFiYyc0asNFYVn2nYLOBPbqda2HGF379VUM1oLkyiZL7ujfhkg@mail.gmail.com>

> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Martin Jambor <mjambor@suse.cz> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > after discussing this with Honza, we have decided that scheduling an
> > extra pass_rebuild_cgraph_edges after pass_fixup_cfg is the correct
> > way to keep the cgraph consistent with gimple IL when early IPA passes
> > need it, such as is the case with the testcase in PR 70965.
> >
> > While needing an extra pass is never nice, this is a consequence of
> > splitting pass_build_ssa_passes out of early optimization passes so
> > that pass_chkp can be in between.
> >
> > The patch below fices the ICE in PR 70965 and has passed bootstrap and
> > testing on x86_64-linux.  OK for trunk?
> 
> Ok.
> 
> Richard.
> 
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> >
> > 2016-11-24  Martin Jambor  <mjambor@suse.cz>
> >
> > gcc/
> >         * passes.def (pass_build_ssa_passes): Add pass_rebuild_cgraph_edges.
> >
> > gcc/testsuite/
> >         * g++.dg/pr70965.C: New test.
> > ---
> >  gcc/passes.def                 |  1 +
> >  gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr70965.C | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 22 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr70965.C
> >
> > diff --git a/gcc/passes.def b/gcc/passes.def
> > index 85a5af0..5faf17f 100644
> > --- a/gcc/passes.def
> > +++ b/gcc/passes.def
> > @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.  If not see
> >    NEXT_PASS (pass_build_ssa_passes);
> >    PUSH_INSERT_PASSES_WITHIN (pass_build_ssa_passes)
> >        NEXT_PASS (pass_fixup_cfg);
> > +      NEXT_PASS (pass_rebuild_cgraph_edges);
> >        NEXT_PASS (pass_build_ssa);
> >        NEXT_PASS (pass_warn_nonnull_compare);
> >        NEXT_PASS (pass_ubsan);

Actually you want to rebuild at the end of pass_build_ssa_passes passes queue.
This may still trip an ICE if one of passes bellow modify CFG (which pass_nothorw
does)

Path is OK with that change.
Honza
> > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr70965.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr70965.C
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..d8a2c35
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr70965.C
> > @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
> > +/* { dg-do compile } */
> > +/* { dg-options "-O2 -std=c++11" } */
> > +
> > +struct A {};
> > +struct B {};
> > +struct C { using p = int *; template <typename> using ra = A; };
> > +struct J : C { template <typename> struct K { typedef C::ra<int> o; }; };
> > +template <typename> struct D
> > +{
> > +  struct H : J::K<int>::o { H (J::p, A) : J::K<int>::o () {} };
> > +  H d;
> > +  D (const char *, const A &x = A ()) : d (0, x) {}
> > +};
> > +extern template class D<char>;
> > +enum L { M };
> > +struct F { virtual char *foo (); };
> > +template <class> struct I : B { static int foo (int) {} };
> > +struct G { typedef I<int> t; };
> > +void foo (int) { G::t::foo (0); }
> > +void bar (const D<char> &, const D<int> &, int, L);
> > +void baz () try { foo (0); } catch (F &e) { bar (e.foo (), "", 0, M); }
> > --
> > 2.10.2
> >

  reply	other threads:[~2016-11-25 13:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-24 16:45 Martin Jambor
2016-11-25  8:48 ` Richard Biener
2016-11-25 13:11   ` Jan Hubicka [this message]
2016-12-02 15:48     ` Martin Jambor
2016-12-02 16:15       ` Jan Hubicka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161125131050.GB4846@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
    --to=hubicka@ucw.cz \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jh@suse.cz \
    --cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).