From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-443514-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 4687 invoked by alias); 5 Dec 2016 18:30:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 4672 invoked by uid 89); 5 Dec 2016 18:30:39 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=pan, 02am, H*f:sk:d13ed0c, H*i:sk:d13ed0c
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 18:30:29 +0000
Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26])	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))	(No client certificate requested)	by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D6A261BA0;	Mon,  5 Dec 2016 18:30:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from redhat.com (ovpn-204-19.brq.redhat.com [10.40.204.19])	by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id uB5IUNCS031866	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO);	Mon, 5 Dec 2016 13:30:26 -0500
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2016 18:30:00 -0000
From: Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
To: Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
Cc: Martin Sebor <msebor@gmail.com>, Rainer Orth <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>,        Gcc Patch List <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] correct handling of non-constant width and precision (pr 78521)
Message-ID: <20161205183023.GC2337@redhat.com>
References: <9b412cbb-1cb0-6341-5b85-78f235f7ae6f@gmail.com> <yddmvgen359.fsf@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> <8ee392e4-6c09-1a7d-b6f1-0aa20ba81cae@gmail.com> <8b27f594-f852-4b78-98f1-b3e48230bcc6@gmail.com> <d13ed0c0-ceeb-7460-c240-999b31dbf709@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <d13ed0c0-ceeb-7460-c240-999b31dbf709@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04)
X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg00377.txt.bz2

On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 11:25:02AM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> We're already using std::min std::max, std::swap and others.

Note we're not using std::min nor std::max.  I gave this a shot a while ago,
but it didn't pan out:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-07/msg00886.html

	Marek