From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 83491 invoked by alias); 2 Feb 2017 10:13:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 83455 invoked by uid 89); 2 Feb 2017 10:13:05 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Feb 2017 10:12:55 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55ED985541; Thu, 2 Feb 2017 10:12:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (ovpn-117-185.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.117.185]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v12ACqxt026437 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 2 Feb 2017 05:12:54 -0500 Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v12ACiBu026684; Thu, 2 Feb 2017 11:12:50 +0100 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id v12ACfIa026683; Thu, 2 Feb 2017 11:12:41 +0100 Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2017 10:13:00 -0000 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Richard Biener , Rainer Orth , Mike Stump , Dodji Seketeli Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Patch ping Message-ID: <20170202101241.GT14051@tucnak> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-02/txt/msg00135.txt.bz2 Hi! I'd like to ping the http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-01/msg02026.html patch, asan testsuite fixes not to use explicit -O* options in testsuite that iterates over all -O*, but instead dg-skip-if etc. As discussed later in the thread, either as is for pr69276.C: -/* { dg-additional-options "-O0 -fno-lto" } */ +/* { dg-skip-if "" { *-*-* } { "*" } { "-O0" } } */ +/* { dg-additional-options "-fno-lto" } */ or just: -/* { dg-additional-options "-O0 -fno-lto" } */ +/* { dg-skip-if "" { *-*-* } { "*" } { "-O0" } } */ or: -/* { dg-additional-options "-O0 -fno-lto" } */ +/* { dg-skip-if "" { *-*-* } { "*" } { "-O0" } } */ +/* { dg-skip-if "" { *-*-* } { "-flto" } { "" } } */ Jakub