From: Daniel Santos <daniel.santos@pobox.com>
To: gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>, Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 4/8] [i386] Modify ix86_save_reg to optionally omit stub-managed registers
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 18:36:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170207184023.19155-4-daniel.santos@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2fd14fe7-8d06-45ab-fb1e-96c9c8f4c03b@pobox.com>
Adds HARD_REG_SET stub_managed_regs to track registers that will be
managed by the pro/epilogue stubs for the function.
Adds a third parameter bool ignore_outlined to ix86_save_reg to specify
rather or not the count should include registers marked in
stub_managed_regs.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Santos <daniel.santos@pobox.com>
---
gcc/config/i386/i386.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
index 6449fbb42bb..d52533103f5 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
@@ -12463,6 +12463,10 @@ ix86_hard_regno_scratch_ok (unsigned int regno)
&& df_regs_ever_live_p (regno)));
}
+/* Registers who's save & restore will be managed by stubs called from
+ pro/epilogue. */
+static HARD_REG_SET GTY(()) stub_managed_regs;
+
/* Return true if register class CL should be an additional allocno
class. */
@@ -12475,7 +12479,7 @@ ix86_additional_allocno_class_p (reg_class_t cl)
/* Return TRUE if we need to save REGNO. */
static bool
-ix86_save_reg (unsigned int regno, bool maybe_eh_return)
+ix86_save_reg (unsigned int regno, bool maybe_eh_return, bool ignore_outlined)
{
/* If there are no caller-saved registers, we preserve all registers,
except for MMX and x87 registers which aren't supported when saving
@@ -12543,6 +12547,10 @@ ix86_save_reg (unsigned int regno, bool maybe_eh_return)
}
}
+ if (ignore_outlined && cfun->machine->outline_ms_sysv
+ && in_hard_reg_set_p (stub_managed_regs, DImode, regno))
+ return false;
+
if (crtl->drap_reg
&& regno == REGNO (crtl->drap_reg)
&& !cfun->machine->no_drap_save_restore)
@@ -12563,7 +12571,7 @@ ix86_nsaved_regs (void)
int regno;
for (regno = 0; regno < FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER; regno++)
- if (GENERAL_REGNO_P (regno) && ix86_save_reg (regno, true))
+ if (GENERAL_REGNO_P (regno) && ix86_save_reg (regno, true, true))
nregs ++;
return nregs;
}
@@ -12579,7 +12587,7 @@ ix86_nsaved_sseregs (void)
if (!TARGET_64BIT_MS_ABI)
return 0;
for (regno = 0; regno < FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER; regno++)
- if (SSE_REGNO_P (regno) && ix86_save_reg (regno, true))
+ if (SSE_REGNO_P (regno) && ix86_save_reg (regno, true, true))
nregs ++;
return nregs;
}
@@ -12659,6 +12667,7 @@ ix86_compute_frame_layout (struct ix86_frame *frame)
frame->nregs = ix86_nsaved_regs ();
frame->nsseregs = ix86_nsaved_sseregs ();
+ CLEAR_HARD_REG_SET (stub_managed_regs);
/* 64-bit MS ABI seem to require stack alignment to be always 16,
except for function prologues, leaf functions and when the defult
@@ -13049,7 +13058,7 @@ ix86_emit_save_regs (void)
rtx_insn *insn;
for (regno = FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER - 1; regno-- > 0; )
- if (GENERAL_REGNO_P (regno) && ix86_save_reg (regno, true))
+ if (GENERAL_REGNO_P (regno) && ix86_save_reg (regno, true, true))
{
insn = emit_insn (gen_push (gen_rtx_REG (word_mode, regno)));
RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P (insn) = 1;
@@ -13139,7 +13148,7 @@ ix86_emit_save_regs_using_mov (HOST_WIDE_INT cfa_offset)
unsigned int regno;
for (regno = 0; regno < FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER; regno++)
- if (GENERAL_REGNO_P (regno) && ix86_save_reg (regno, true))
+ if (GENERAL_REGNO_P (regno) && ix86_save_reg (regno, true, true))
{
ix86_emit_save_reg_using_mov (word_mode, regno, cfa_offset);
cfa_offset -= UNITS_PER_WORD;
@@ -13154,7 +13163,7 @@ ix86_emit_save_sse_regs_using_mov (HOST_WIDE_INT cfa_offset)
unsigned int regno;
for (regno = 0; regno < FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER; regno++)
- if (SSE_REGNO_P (regno) && ix86_save_reg (regno, true))
+ if (SSE_REGNO_P (regno) && ix86_save_reg (regno, true, true))
{
ix86_emit_save_reg_using_mov (V4SFmode, regno, cfa_offset);
cfa_offset -= GET_MODE_SIZE (V4SFmode);
@@ -13538,13 +13547,13 @@ get_scratch_register_on_entry (struct scratch_reg *sr)
&& !static_chain_p
&& drap_regno != CX_REG)
regno = CX_REG;
- else if (ix86_save_reg (BX_REG, true))
+ else if (ix86_save_reg (BX_REG, true, false))
regno = BX_REG;
/* esi is the static chain register. */
else if (!(regparm == 3 && static_chain_p)
- && ix86_save_reg (SI_REG, true))
+ && ix86_save_reg (SI_REG, true, false))
regno = SI_REG;
- else if (ix86_save_reg (DI_REG, true))
+ else if (ix86_save_reg (DI_REG, true, false))
regno = DI_REG;
else
{
@@ -14648,7 +14657,7 @@ ix86_emit_restore_regs_using_mov (HOST_WIDE_INT cfa_offset,
unsigned int regno;
for (regno = 0; regno < FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER; regno++)
- if (GENERAL_REGNO_P (regno) && ix86_save_reg (regno, maybe_eh_return))
+ if (GENERAL_REGNO_P (regno) && ix86_save_reg (regno, maybe_eh_return, true))
{
rtx reg = gen_rtx_REG (word_mode, regno);
rtx mem;
@@ -14687,7 +14696,7 @@ ix86_emit_restore_sse_regs_using_mov (HOST_WIDE_INT cfa_offset,
unsigned int regno;
for (regno = 0; regno < FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER; regno++)
- if (SSE_REGNO_P (regno) && ix86_save_reg (regno, maybe_eh_return))
+ if (SSE_REGNO_P (regno) && ix86_save_reg (regno, maybe_eh_return, true))
{
rtx reg = gen_rtx_REG (V4SFmode, regno);
rtx mem;
--
2.11.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-07 18:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-07 18:34 [RFC] [PATCH v3 0/8] [i386] Use out-of-line stubs for ms_abi pro/epilogues Daniel Santos
2017-02-07 18:36 ` [PATCH 3/8] [i386] Adds class xlouge_layout and new fields to struct machine_function Daniel Santos
2017-02-07 18:36 ` [PATCH 2/8] [i386] Add option -moutline-msabi-xlogues Daniel Santos
2017-02-08 23:28 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2017-02-10 4:43 ` Daniel Santos
2017-02-10 16:54 ` Sandra Loosemore
2017-02-10 17:32 ` Daniel Santos
2017-04-01 22:37 ` Daniel Santos
2017-02-07 18:36 ` Daniel Santos [this message]
2017-02-07 18:37 ` [PATCH 5/8] [i386] Modify ix86_compute_frame_layout for foutline-msabi-xlogues Daniel Santos
2017-02-07 18:37 ` [PATCH 6/8] [i386] Add patterns and predicates foutline-msabi-xlouges Daniel Santos
2017-02-07 18:37 ` [PATCH 1/8] [i386] Minor refactoring Daniel Santos
2017-02-07 18:37 ` [PATCH 7/8] [i386] Add msabi pro/epilogue stubs to libgcc Daniel Santos
2017-02-10 10:32 ` [RFC] [PATCH v3 0/8] [i386] Use out-of-line stubs for ms_abi pro/epilogues Uros Bizjak
2017-02-10 11:34 ` JonY
2017-02-10 17:20 ` Daniel Santos
2017-02-11 0:30 ` JonY
2017-02-11 7:24 ` Daniel Santos
2017-03-13 18:40 ` Daniel Santos
2017-03-10 4:42 ` Daniel Santos
2017-03-30 17:55 ` Daniel Santos
2017-03-30 23:28 ` JonY
2017-02-10 17:55 ` Daniel Santos
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170207184023.19155-4-daniel.santos@pobox.com \
--to=daniel.santos@pobox.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=hubicka@ucw.cz \
--cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).