From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 101838 invoked by alias); 12 Mar 2017 22:00:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 101715 invoked by uid 89); 12 Mar 2017 22:00:32 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=HCc:D*fr X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 22:00:30 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FD3B7E9FD; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 22:00:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (ovpn-112-11.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.112.11]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v2CM0RKc025484; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 18:00:28 -0400 Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 22:00:00 -0000 Message-Id: <20170312.150026.1178870280334009676.davem@redhat.com> To: gerald@pfeifer.com Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, rth@redhat.com, ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr Subject: Re: install.texi and sparc-*-linux* From: David Miller In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2017-03/txt/msg00621.txt.bz2 From: Gerald Pfeifer Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 12:39:56 +0100 (CET) > On Sun, 12 Mar 2017, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: >> References to dependencies on really, really old versions of >> binutils (talking 10+ years here) which I think we can remove. >> Let me follow-up with some of you with concrete suggestions >> around that. > > The section on sparc-*-linux* currently has this: > > GCC versions 3.0 and higher require binutils 2.11.2 and glibc 2.2.4 > or newer on this platform. All earlier binutils and glibc > releases mishandled unaligned relocations on @code{sparc-*-*} targets. > > Okay to yank it? No objections from me.