From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 105815 invoked by alias); 28 Mar 2017 22:23:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 105796 invoked by uid 89); 28 Mar 2017 22:23:28 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:340, H*Ad:U*ro, HCc:D*DE, H*Ad:D*DE X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 22:23:27 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AE5281F07; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 22:23:27 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 8AE5281F07 Authentication-Results: ext-mx02.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx02.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=jakub@redhat.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com 8AE5281F07 Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (ovpn-116-72.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.72]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF2AA5C881; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 22:23:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v2SMNNwk018135; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 00:23:24 +0200 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id v2SMNLX6018134; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 00:23:21 +0200 Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 22:24:00 -0000 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Tom de Vries Cc: Mike Stump , Rainer Orth , GCC Patches Subject: Re: [PATCH, testsuite] Allow braces around relative line numbers Message-ID: <20170328222321.GE17461@tucnak> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: <31cf86fd-eda4-e373-5263-a3b36854109e@mentor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <31cf86fd-eda4-e373-5263-a3b36854109e@mentor.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-03/txt/msg01463.txt.bz2 On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 08:27:54AM +0200, Tom de Vries wrote: > this patch fixes testsuite PR80220 - "relative line numbers don't work when > put between braces". What is the advantage of putting the line numbers between braces? Isn't it easier to just drop those? Jakub