public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>,
	       Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana.radhakrishnan@arm.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [AARCH64 PATCH] Don't provide -Wpsabi notes for AARCH64 (PR target/77728)
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 16:02:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170426142948.GQ1809@tucnak> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170425100142.GV1809@tucnak>

Hi!

As discussed on IRC, apparently the -Wpsabi warning is not appropriate
for aarch64, only for ARM, because only ARM had the almost like new AAPCS,
except for static data members and typedefs (and sometimes
self-inconsistent) ABI, while on AArch64 it only changed in r237224
for GCC 7.

Thus, the following patch reverts the -Wpsabi related changes and keeps just
the ABI fix and some of the cleanups.

Ok for trunk and 7.1 if it passes bootstrap/regtest?  Could somebody from ARM
bootstrap/regtest it?  I can start a distro rpm build with that patch, but
that will likely be slower.

2017-04-26  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

	PR target/77728
	* config/aarch64/aarch64.c (struct aarch64_fn_arg_alignment): Remove.
	(aarch64_function_arg_alignment): Return unsigned int again, but still
	ignore TYPE_FIELDS chain decls other than FIELD_DECLs.
	(aarch64_layout_arg): Adjust aarch64_function_arg_alignment caller.
	Don't emit -Wpsabi note.
	(aarch64_function_arg_boundary): Likewise.
	(aarch64_gimplify_va_arg_expr): Adjust aarch64_function_arg_alignment
	caller.
testsuite/
	* g++.dg/abi/pr77728-2.C: Don't expect -Wpsabi notes.

--- gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c.jj	2017-04-25 15:55:38.000000000 +0200
+++ gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c	2017-04-26 15:59:09.224554190 +0200
@@ -2256,58 +2256,34 @@ aarch64_vfp_is_call_candidate (cumulativ
 						  NULL);
 }
 
-struct aarch64_fn_arg_alignment
-{
-  /* Alignment for FIELD_DECLs in function arguments.  */
-  unsigned int alignment;
-  /* Alignment for decls other than FIELD_DECLs in function arguments.  */
-  unsigned int warn_alignment;
-};
-
-/* Given MODE and TYPE of a function argument, return a pair of alignments in
+/* Given MODE and TYPE of a function argument, return the alignment in
    bits.  The idea is to suppress any stronger alignment requested by
    the user and opt for the natural alignment (specified in AAPCS64 \S 4.1).
    This is a helper function for local use only.  */
 
-static struct aarch64_fn_arg_alignment
+static unsigned int
 aarch64_function_arg_alignment (machine_mode mode, const_tree type)
 {
-  struct aarch64_fn_arg_alignment aa;
-  aa.alignment = 0;
-  aa.warn_alignment = 0;
-
   if (!type)
-    {
-      aa.alignment = GET_MODE_ALIGNMENT (mode);
-      return aa;
-    }
+    return GET_MODE_ALIGNMENT (mode);
 
   if (integer_zerop (TYPE_SIZE (type)))
-    return aa;
+    return 0;
 
   gcc_assert (TYPE_MODE (type) == mode);
 
   if (!AGGREGATE_TYPE_P (type))
-    {
-      aa.alignment = TYPE_ALIGN (TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (type));
-      return aa;
-    }
+    return TYPE_ALIGN (TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (type));
 
   if (TREE_CODE (type) == ARRAY_TYPE)
-    {
-      aa.alignment = TYPE_ALIGN (TREE_TYPE (type));
-      return aa;
-    }
+    return TYPE_ALIGN (TREE_TYPE (type));
 
+  unsigned int alignment = 0;
   for (tree field = TYPE_FIELDS (type); field; field = DECL_CHAIN (field))
-    {
-      if (TREE_CODE (field) == FIELD_DECL)
-	aa.alignment = std::max (aa.alignment, DECL_ALIGN (field));
-      else
-	aa.warn_alignment = std::max (aa.warn_alignment, DECL_ALIGN (field));
-    }
+    if (TREE_CODE (field) == FIELD_DECL)
+      alignment = std::max (alignment, DECL_ALIGN (field));
 
-  return aa;
+  return alignment;
 }
 
 /* Layout a function argument according to the AAPCS64 rules.  The rule
@@ -2399,27 +2375,16 @@ aarch64_layout_arg (cumulative_args_t pc
 
       /* C.8 if the argument has an alignment of 16 then the NGRN is
          rounded up to the next even number.  */
-      if (nregs == 2 && ncrn % 2)
-	{
-	  struct aarch64_fn_arg_alignment aa
-	    = aarch64_function_arg_alignment (mode, type);
-
+      if (nregs == 2
+	  && ncrn % 2
 	  /* The == 16 * BITS_PER_UNIT instead of >= 16 * BITS_PER_UNIT
-	     comparisons are there because for > 16 * BITS_PER_UNIT
+	     comparison is there because for > 16 * BITS_PER_UNIT
 	     alignment nregs should be > 2 and therefore it should be
 	     passed by reference rather than value.  */
-	  if (aa.warn_alignment == 16 * BITS_PER_UNIT
-	      && aa.alignment < aa.warn_alignment
-	      && warn_psabi
-	      && currently_expanding_gimple_stmt)
-	    inform (input_location,
-		    "parameter passing for argument of type %qT "
-		    "changed in GCC 7.1", type);
-	  else if (aa.alignment == 16 * BITS_PER_UNIT)
-	    {
-	      ++ncrn;
-	      gcc_assert (ncrn + nregs <= NUM_ARG_REGS);
-	    }
+	  && aarch64_function_arg_alignment (mode, type) == 16 * BITS_PER_UNIT)
+	{
+	  ++ncrn;
+	  gcc_assert (ncrn + nregs <= NUM_ARG_REGS);
 	}
 
       /* NREGS can be 0 when e.g. an empty structure is to be passed.
@@ -2454,10 +2419,8 @@ aarch64_layout_arg (cumulative_args_t pc
      this argument and align the total size if necessary.  */
 on_stack:
   pcum->aapcs_stack_words = size / UNITS_PER_WORD;
-  struct aarch64_fn_arg_alignment aa
-    = aarch64_function_arg_alignment (mode, type);
 
-  if (aa.alignment == 16 * BITS_PER_UNIT)
+  if (aarch64_function_arg_alignment (mode, type) == 16 * BITS_PER_UNIT)
     pcum->aapcs_stack_size = ROUND_UP (pcum->aapcs_stack_size,
 				       16 / UNITS_PER_WORD);
   return;
@@ -2548,17 +2511,8 @@ aarch64_function_arg_regno_p (unsigned r
 static unsigned int
 aarch64_function_arg_boundary (machine_mode mode, const_tree type)
 {
-  struct aarch64_fn_arg_alignment aa
-    = aarch64_function_arg_alignment (mode, type);
-  aa.alignment = MIN (MAX (aa.alignment, PARM_BOUNDARY), STACK_BOUNDARY);
-  aa.warn_alignment
-    = MIN (MAX (aa.warn_alignment, PARM_BOUNDARY), STACK_BOUNDARY);
-
-  if (warn_psabi && aa.warn_alignment > aa.alignment)
-    inform (input_location, "parameter passing for argument of type %qT "
-	    "changed in GCC 7.1", type);
-
-  return aa.alignment;
+  unsigned int alignment = aarch64_function_arg_alignment (mode, type);
+  return MIN (MAX (alignment, PARM_BOUNDARY), STACK_BOUNDARY);
 }
 
 /* For use by FUNCTION_ARG_PADDING (MODE, TYPE).
@@ -10258,9 +10212,7 @@ aarch64_gimplify_va_arg_expr (tree valis
   stack = build3 (COMPONENT_REF, TREE_TYPE (f_stack), unshare_expr (valist),
 		  f_stack, NULL_TREE);
   size = int_size_in_bytes (type);
-  struct aarch64_fn_arg_alignment aa
-    = aarch64_function_arg_alignment (mode, type);
-  align = aa.alignment / BITS_PER_UNIT;
+  align = aarch64_function_arg_alignment (mode, type) / BITS_PER_UNIT;
 
   dw_align = false;
   adjust = 0;
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/abi/pr77728-2.C.jj	2017-04-25 15:55:38.000000000 +0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/abi/pr77728-2.C	2017-04-26 16:01:18.414878207 +0200
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 // { dg-do compile { target { { aarch64-*-* } && c++11 } } }
-// { dg-options "-Wpsabi" }
+// { dg-options "" }
 
 #include <stdarg.h>
 
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ struct K : public D { typedef A<N> T; in
 struct L { static int h alignas (16); int i, j, k, l; };
 
 int
-fn1 (int a, B<0> b)	// { dg-message "note: parameter passing for argument of type \[^\n\r]* changed in GCC 7\.1" }
+fn1 (int a, B<0> b)
 {
   return a + b.i;
 }
@@ -42,14 +42,13 @@ fn2 (int a, B<1> b)
 }
 
 int
-fn3 (int a, L b)	// { dg-message "note: parameter passing for argument of type \[^\n\r]* changed in GCC 7\.1" }
+fn3 (int a, L b)
 {
   return a + b.i;
 }
 
 int
 fn4 (int a, int b, int c, int d, int e, int f, int g, int h, int i, int j, int k, int l, int m, B<0> n, ...)
-// { dg-message "note: parameter passing for argument of type \[^\n\r]* changed in GCC 7\.1" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
 {
   va_list ap;
   va_start (ap, n);
@@ -110,7 +109,6 @@ fn9 (int a, int b, int c, int d, int e,
 
 int
 fn10 (int a, int b, int c, int d, int e, int f, int g, int h, int i, int j, int k, int l, int m, J n, ...)
-// { dg-message "note: parameter passing for argument of type \[^\n\r]* changed in GCC 7\.1" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
 {
   va_list ap;
   va_start (ap, n);
@@ -121,7 +119,6 @@ fn10 (int a, int b, int c, int d, int e,
 
 int
 fn11 (int a, int b, int c, int d, int e, int f, int g, int h, int i, int j, int k, int l, int m, K<0> n, ...)
-// { dg-message "note: parameter passing for argument of type \[^\n\r]* changed in GCC 7\.1" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
 {
   va_list ap;
   va_start (ap, n);
@@ -153,19 +150,16 @@ test ()
   static J j;
   static K<0> k0;
   static K<2> k2;
-  fn1 (1, b0);	// { dg-message "note: parameter passing for argument of type \[^\n\r]* changed in GCC 7\.1" }
+  fn1 (1, b0);
   fn2 (1, b1);
-  fn3 (1, l);	// { dg-message "note: parameter passing for argument of type \[^\n\r]* changed in GCC 7\.1" }
+  fn3 (1, l);
   fn4 (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, b0, 1, 2, 3, 4);
-  // { dg-message "note: parameter passing for argument of type \[^\n\r]* changed in GCC 7\.1" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
   fn5 (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, b1, 1, 2, 3, 4);
   fn6 (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, c, 1, 2, 3, 4);
   fn7 (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, e, 1, 2, 3, 4);
   fn8 (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, h, 1, 2, 3, 4);
   fn9 (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, i, 1, 2, 3, 4);
   fn10 (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, j, 1, 2, 3, 4);
-  // { dg-message "note: parameter passing for argument of type \[^\n\r]* changed in GCC 7\.1" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
   fn11 (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, k0, 1, 2, 3, 4);
-  // { dg-message "note: parameter passing for argument of type \[^\n\r]* changed in GCC 7\.1" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
   fn12 (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, k2, 1, 2, 3, 4);
 }

	Jakub

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-04-26 14:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-25 10:04 [AARCH64 ABI PATCH] Change AARCH64 ABI to match AAPCS, provide -Wpsabi notes " Jakub Jelinek
2017-04-25 12:51 ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2017-04-25 12:58   ` Jakub Jelinek
2017-04-26 16:02 ` Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2017-04-26 16:34   ` [AARCH64 PATCH] Don't provide -Wpsabi notes for AARCH64 " Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2017-04-27  1:45   ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170426142948.GQ1809@tucnak \
    --to=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=ramana.radhakrishnan@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).