public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Santos <daniel.santos@pobox.com>
To: gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>,	Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 07/12] [i386] Modify ix86_save_reg to optionally omit stub-managed registers
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 08:44:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170427080932.11703-7-daniel.santos@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49e81c0b-07a4-22df-d7c3-2439177ac7cf@pobox.com>

Add HARD_REG_SET stub_managed_regs to track which registers will be
managed by the pro/epilogue stubs for the function.

Add a third parameter bool ignore_outlined to ix86_save_reg to specify
rather or not the count should include registers marked in
stub_managed_regs.  All call sites are modified.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Santos <daniel.santos@pobox.com>
---
 gcc/config/i386/i386.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
index 2da3da1f97a..4f0cb7dd6cc 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
@@ -12618,6 +12618,10 @@ ix86_hard_regno_scratch_ok (unsigned int regno)
 	      && df_regs_ever_live_p (regno)));
 }
 
+/* Registers who's save & restore will be managed by stubs called from
+   pro/epilogue.  */
+static HARD_REG_SET GTY(()) stub_managed_regs;
+
 /* Return true if register class CL should be an additional allocno
    class.  */
 
@@ -12630,7 +12634,7 @@ ix86_additional_allocno_class_p (reg_class_t cl)
 /* Return TRUE if we need to save REGNO.  */
 
 static bool
-ix86_save_reg (unsigned int regno, bool maybe_eh_return)
+ix86_save_reg (unsigned int regno, bool maybe_eh_return, bool ignore_outlined)
 {
   /* If there are no caller-saved registers, we preserve all registers,
      except for MMX and x87 registers which aren't supported when saving
@@ -12698,6 +12702,10 @@ ix86_save_reg (unsigned int regno, bool maybe_eh_return)
 	}
     }
 
+  if (ignore_outlined && cfun->machine->call_ms2sysv
+      && in_hard_reg_set_p (stub_managed_regs, DImode, regno))
+    return false;
+
   if (crtl->drap_reg
       && regno == REGNO (crtl->drap_reg)
       && !cfun->machine->no_drap_save_restore)
@@ -12718,7 +12726,7 @@ ix86_nsaved_regs (void)
   int regno;
 
   for (regno = 0; regno < FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER; regno++)
-    if (GENERAL_REGNO_P (regno) && ix86_save_reg (regno, true))
+    if (GENERAL_REGNO_P (regno) && ix86_save_reg (regno, true, true))
       nregs ++;
   return nregs;
 }
@@ -12734,7 +12742,7 @@ ix86_nsaved_sseregs (void)
   if (!TARGET_64BIT_MS_ABI)
     return 0;
   for (regno = 0; regno < FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER; regno++)
-    if (SSE_REGNO_P (regno) && ix86_save_reg (regno, true))
+    if (SSE_REGNO_P (regno) && ix86_save_reg (regno, true, true))
       nregs ++;
   return nregs;
 }
@@ -12814,6 +12822,7 @@ ix86_compute_frame_layout (struct ix86_frame *frame)
 
   frame->nregs = ix86_nsaved_regs ();
   frame->nsseregs = ix86_nsaved_sseregs ();
+  CLEAR_HARD_REG_SET (stub_managed_regs);
 
   /* 64-bit MS ABI seem to require stack alignment to be always 16,
      except for function prologues, leaf functions and when the defult
@@ -13207,7 +13216,7 @@ ix86_emit_save_regs (void)
   rtx_insn *insn;
 
   for (regno = FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER - 1; regno-- > 0; )
-    if (GENERAL_REGNO_P (regno) && ix86_save_reg (regno, true))
+    if (GENERAL_REGNO_P (regno) && ix86_save_reg (regno, true, true))
       {
 	insn = emit_insn (gen_push (gen_rtx_REG (word_mode, regno)));
 	RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P (insn) = 1;
@@ -13297,7 +13306,7 @@ ix86_emit_save_regs_using_mov (HOST_WIDE_INT cfa_offset)
   unsigned int regno;
 
   for (regno = 0; regno < FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER; regno++)
-    if (GENERAL_REGNO_P (regno) && ix86_save_reg (regno, true))
+    if (GENERAL_REGNO_P (regno) && ix86_save_reg (regno, true, true))
       {
         ix86_emit_save_reg_using_mov (word_mode, regno, cfa_offset);
 	cfa_offset -= UNITS_PER_WORD;
@@ -13312,7 +13321,7 @@ ix86_emit_save_sse_regs_using_mov (HOST_WIDE_INT cfa_offset)
   unsigned int regno;
 
   for (regno = 0; regno < FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER; regno++)
-    if (SSE_REGNO_P (regno) && ix86_save_reg (regno, true))
+    if (SSE_REGNO_P (regno) && ix86_save_reg (regno, true, true))
       {
 	ix86_emit_save_reg_using_mov (V4SFmode, regno, cfa_offset);
 	cfa_offset -= GET_MODE_SIZE (V4SFmode);
@@ -13696,13 +13705,13 @@ get_scratch_register_on_entry (struct scratch_reg *sr)
 	       && !static_chain_p
 	       && drap_regno != CX_REG)
 	regno = CX_REG;
-      else if (ix86_save_reg (BX_REG, true))
+      else if (ix86_save_reg (BX_REG, true, false))
 	regno = BX_REG;
       /* esi is the static chain register.  */
       else if (!(regparm == 3 && static_chain_p)
-	       && ix86_save_reg (SI_REG, true))
+	       && ix86_save_reg (SI_REG, true, false))
 	regno = SI_REG;
-      else if (ix86_save_reg (DI_REG, true))
+      else if (ix86_save_reg (DI_REG, true, false))
 	regno = DI_REG;
       else
 	{
@@ -14812,7 +14821,7 @@ ix86_emit_restore_regs_using_mov (HOST_WIDE_INT cfa_offset,
   unsigned int regno;
 
   for (regno = 0; regno < FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER; regno++)
-    if (GENERAL_REGNO_P (regno) && ix86_save_reg (regno, maybe_eh_return))
+    if (GENERAL_REGNO_P (regno) && ix86_save_reg (regno, maybe_eh_return, true))
       {
 	rtx reg = gen_rtx_REG (word_mode, regno);
 	rtx mem;
@@ -14851,7 +14860,7 @@ ix86_emit_restore_sse_regs_using_mov (HOST_WIDE_INT cfa_offset,
   unsigned int regno;
 
   for (regno = 0; regno < FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER; regno++)
-    if (SSE_REGNO_P (regno) && ix86_save_reg (regno, maybe_eh_return))
+    if (SSE_REGNO_P (regno) && ix86_save_reg (regno, maybe_eh_return, true))
       {
 	rtx reg = gen_rtx_REG (V4SFmode, regno);
 	rtx mem;
-- 
2.11.0

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-04-27  8:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-27  8:05 [PATCH v4 0/12] [i386] Improve 64-bit Microsoft to System V ABI pro/epilogues Daniel Santos
2017-04-27  8:05 ` [PATCH 08/12] [i386] Modify ix86_compute_frame_layout for -mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues Daniel Santos
2017-04-27  8:05 ` [PATCH 01/12] [i386] Re-align stack frame prior to SSE saves Daniel Santos
2017-04-27  8:05 ` [PATCH 10/12] [i386] Add ms2sysv pro/epilogue stubs to libgcc Daniel Santos
2017-04-27  8:05 ` [PATCH 09/12] [i386] Add patterns and predicates foutline-msabi-xlouges Daniel Santos
2017-05-01 11:18   ` Uros Bizjak
2017-05-02 22:19     ` Daniel Santos
2017-05-03  6:17       ` Uros Bizjak
2017-05-03  7:38         ` Daniel Santos
2017-05-03  8:38           ` Uros Bizjak
2017-05-04 21:35   ` [PATCH 09/12 rev1] [i386] Add patterns and predicates mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues Daniel Santos
2017-04-27  8:05 ` [PATCH 11/12] [i386] Add remainder of -mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues implementation Daniel Santos
2017-05-04 22:11   ` [PATCH 11/12 rev1] " Daniel Santos
2017-04-27  8:05 ` [PATCH 05/12] [i386] Add option -mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues Daniel Santos
2017-04-28  6:00   ` Sandra Loosemore
2017-04-28  7:37     ` [PATCH 05/12 rev 1] " Daniel Santos
2017-04-27  8:05 ` [PATCH 03/12] [i386] Use re-aligned stack pointer for aligned SSE movs Daniel Santos
2017-04-27  8:05 ` [PATCH 12/12] [i386,testsuite] Test program for ms to sysv abi function calls Daniel Santos
2017-05-17  9:52   ` Thomas Preudhomme
2017-04-27  8:05 ` [PATCH 02/12] [i386] Keep stack pointer valid after after re-alignment Daniel Santos
2017-04-27  8:23 ` [PATCH 04/12] [i386] Minor refactoring Daniel Santos
2017-04-27  8:44 ` Daniel Santos [this message]
2017-04-27  8:51 ` [PATCH 06/12] [i386] Add class xlogue_layout and new fields to struct machine_function Daniel Santos
2017-04-27 18:32 ` [PATCH v4 0/12 GCC8] [i386] Improve 64-bit Microsoft to System V ABI pro/epilogues Daniel Santos
2017-05-01 11:31 ` [PATCH v4 0/12] " Uros Bizjak
2017-05-02 10:25   ` JonY
2017-05-02 10:45     ` Kai Tietz
2017-05-03  6:01       ` Daniel Santos
2017-05-05  9:05       ` Daniel Santos
2017-05-06 20:41         ` Daniel Santos
2017-05-08 20:07           ` Daniel Santos
2017-05-03  4:32     ` Daniel Santos
2017-05-13  0:01 ` [PING] " Daniel Santos
2017-05-13 18:29   ` Uros Bizjak
2017-05-13 23:43     ` Daniel Santos
2017-05-14 10:25       ` Uros Bizjak
2017-07-26 19:03         ` H.J. Lu
2017-07-27  0:36           ` Daniel Santos
2017-07-28 13:51           ` Daniel Santos
2017-07-28 14:41             ` H.J. Lu
2017-07-31 10:25               ` Daniel Santos

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170427080932.11703-7-daniel.santos@pobox.com \
    --to=daniel.santos@pobox.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=hubicka@ucw.cz \
    --cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).