From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 43226 invoked by alias); 27 Apr 2017 14:25:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 38761 invoked by uid 89); 27 Apr 2017 14:25:49 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=scanned X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 3 recipients X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 14:25:47 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FA7067EC9; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 14:25:48 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 5FA7067EC9 Authentication-Results: ext-mx09.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx09.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=jakub@redhat.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com 5FA7067EC9 Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (ovpn-116-29.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.29]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B90F599478; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 14:25:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v3REPiXN014250; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 16:25:44 +0200 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id v3REPfH4014249; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 16:25:41 +0200 Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 14:49:00 -0000 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Martin =?utf-8?B?TGnFoWth?= Cc: Bernd Edlinger , GCC Patches , Segher Boessenkool , "wschmidt@gcc.gnu.org" , "kelvin@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix test-case on ppc64le (PR testsuite/79455). Message-ID: <20170427142541.GC1809@tucnak> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: <0fca1de5-0203-f14a-d59e-e70664ce57ec@suse.cz> <20170424151939.GP1809@tucnak> <7df50141-5b92-d6f3-c993-86cdec053f58@suse.cz> <4d5afb02-a96e-b405-9e24-5928c551680c@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <4d5afb02-a96e-b405-9e24-5928c551680c@suse.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-04/txt/msg01405.txt.bz2 On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 04:11:36PM +0200, Martin Liška wrote: > On 04/26/2017 03:38 PM, Bernd Edlinger wrote: > > I think however, that only one extra call frame can ever > > be seen, because the stack frames are only created by instrumentation > > at instrumented function begin and end statements. > > > > So probably the test expectations could be more strict than in the > > proposed patch. > > Hi. > > I'm sending more restricted version of patch that works both on x86_64 and ppcl64. > > Ready for trunk? > Martin > >From 76af8598879977fdf7c924f5576c04b8d9260013 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: marxin > Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 14:59:18 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH] Fix test-case on ppc64le (PR testsuite/79455). > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > 2017-04-24 Martin Liska > > * c-c++-common/tsan/race_on_mutex.c: Make the scanned pattern > more generic. Ok for trunk. Jakub