From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 52407 invoked by alias); 30 Apr 2017 18:11:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 52383 invoked by uid 89); 30 Apr 2017 18:11:05 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=5x, UD:6.x, 6x, UD:5.x X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sun, 30 Apr 2017 18:11:04 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F8073B74F; Sun, 30 Apr 2017 18:11:05 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 6F8073B74F Authentication-Results: ext-mx06.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx06.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=jakub@redhat.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com 6F8073B74F Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (ovpn-116-29.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.29]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD51817A9D; Sun, 30 Apr 2017 18:11:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v3UIB1NH010732; Sun, 30 Apr 2017 20:11:01 +0200 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id v3UIAvPt010731; Sun, 30 Apr 2017 20:10:57 +0200 Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2017 23:38:00 -0000 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Gerald Pfeifer Cc: Steve Kargl , Andreas Schwab , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Who broke options.h? Message-ID: <20170430181057.GU1809@tucnak> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: <20170425135922.GA19857@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <87lgqopk1k.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <20170425165404.GC53633@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20170425165856.GH1809@tucnak> <20170425194300.GA54964@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20170425194629.GL1809@tucnak> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-04/txt/msg01584.txt.bz2 On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 07:49:45PM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Tue, 25 Apr 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > Committed to trunk, 7.x will need to wait until 7.1 is released, > > the rc1 is already in the works and this isn't anything new, I > > see the same thing already in GCC 4.0. > > Thanks, Jakub! Are you planning to apply this to GCC 7 after the > release of 7.1? Yes. > And would you mind backporting this to active release branches? > (If not, okay if I do?) I'll handle it together with other 6.x and 5.x backports of my patches. Jakub