From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 126953 invoked by alias); 3 Jun 2017 19:56:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 126930 invoked by uid 89); 3 Jun 2017 19:56:58 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: gate.crashing.org Received: from gate.crashing.org (HELO gate.crashing.org) (63.228.1.57) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 19:56:57 +0000 Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v53Jutja015447; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 14:56:55 -0500 Received: (from segher@localhost) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id v53JusEs015446; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 14:56:54 -0500 Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2017 19:56:00 -0000 From: Segher Boessenkool To: Eric Botcazou Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [rs6000] Fix ICE with -fstack-limit-register and large frames Message-ID: <20170603195654.GD19687@gate.crashing.org> References: <1944532.Kj3BqOocuy@polaris> <41568560.kqil6v8Xzx@polaris> <20170602162531.GZ19687@gate.crashing.org> <2344035.ZvlJBgxmTA@polaris> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2344035.ZvlJBgxmTA@polaris> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-06/txt/msg00175.txt.bz2 On Sat, Jun 03, 2017 at 12:34:21PM +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote: > > Because you cannot during reload, or another reason? We always use LRA > > on powerpc nowadays, and LRA can deal with this. > > Because you cannot during prologue/epilogue generation. Ah, this code is generated only then, I see now. > > Only the first hunk (rs6000.md) applies, the rest is ignored (there is a > > blank line here instead of a diff header). > > !?? The patch contains a single hunk for config/rs6000/rs6000.c. The second hunk is the testcase. I now see it isn't even part of the patch, just pasted on. I opened PR80966. Thanks, Segher