From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 90199 invoked by alias); 19 Jun 2017 18:12:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 90138 invoked by uid 89); 19 Jun 2017 18:11:58 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*Ad:D*nyu.edu, H*F:D*nyu.edu, H*Ad:U*kenner, recall X-HELO: vlsi1.gnat.com Received: from vlsi1.gnat.com (HELO vlsi1.gnat.com) (205.232.38.7) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 18:11:57 +0000 Received: by vlsi1.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 3004) id 50E0C33CA8; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 14:12:00 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 18:12:00 -0000 To: law@redhat.com Subject: Re: RFC: stack/heap collision vulnerability and mitigation with GCC Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-Id: <20170619181200.50E0C33CA8@vlsi1.gnat.com> From: kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner) X-SW-Source: 2017-06/txt/msg01362.txt.bz2 Out of curiousity, does the old Alpha/VMS stack-checking API meet the requirements? From what I recall, I think it does.